Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for AIDS-Infected Patient Classification

Background: According to UNAIDS (2023), approximately 39.9 million people are living with HIV worldwide, with 1.3 million new cases and 630,000 AIDS-related deaths in 2023. This indicates that HIV/AIDS remains a serious global health threat. Machine learning methods have the potential to improve the accuracy of AIDS infection classification.Objective: This research is aimed to determine the best classification method based on prediction accuracy and to identify the method with the best performance for further analysis.Methods: This research used a quantitative approach by evaluating the performance of machine learning algorithms: Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, Naive Bayes, and Logistic Regression. Secondary data were obtained from the UCI Machine Learning Repository, comprising 2,000 observations of AIDS patients and 23 variables. Model evaluation used a confusion matrix to calculate accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The best model, logistic regression, was further analyzed with parameter significance tests, odds ratios, and goodness of fit.Results: Logistic regression yielded an accuracy of 88.4%, precision and recall of 90%, and the highest F1-score. Variables significant to AIDS were: time, preanti, symptom, offtrt, and cd420. The model passed the Hosmer and Lemeshow test (p-value = 0.365) with a Nagelkerke R-Square of 0.642.Conclusion: Machine learning approaches, particularly logistic regression, support early detection of AIDS and data-driven medical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Kesehatan Vokasional
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22146/jkesvo.107716
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for AIDS-Infected Patient Classification

Larisa Mutiara Putri, Billy Christandy Suyono, Ardi Kurniawan, Rindiani Ahmada Alisiah et al.
Jurnal Kesehatan Vokasional
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for AIDS-Infected Patient Classification

Larisa Mutiara Putri, Billy Christandy Suyono, Ardi Kurniawan, Rindiani Ahmada Alisiah, Citrawani Marthabakti
article en

Abstract

Background: According to UNAIDS (2023), approximately 39.9 million people are living with HIV worldwide, with 1.3 million new cases and 630,000 AIDS-related deaths in 2023. This indicates that HIV/AIDS remains a serious global health threat. Machine learning methods have the potential to improve the accuracy of AIDS infection classification.Objective: This research is aimed to determine the best classification method based on prediction accuracy and to identify the method with the best performance for further analysis.Methods: This research used a quantitative approach by evaluating the performance of machine learning algorithms: Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, Naive Bayes, and Logistic Regression. Secondary data were obtained from the UCI Machine Learning Repository, comprising 2,000 observations of AIDS patients and 23 variables. Model evaluation used a confusion matrix to calculate accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The best model, logistic regression, was further analyzed with parameter significance tests, odds ratios, and goodness of fit.Results: Logistic regression yielded an accuracy of 88.4%, precision and recall of 90%, and the highest F1-score. Variables significant to AIDS were: time, preanti, symptom, offtrt, and cd420. The model passed the Hosmer and Lemeshow test (p-value = 0.365) with a Nagelkerke R-Square of 0.642.Conclusion: Machine learning approaches, particularly logistic regression, support early detection of AIDS and data-driven medical decision-making.

Jurnal Kesehatan VokasionalVol. 10(3)
Universitas Airlangga (ID)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.