Extermination by Starvation and Genocide in Ukraine, 1932–1933

Abstract The present work examines whether the Holodomor, the famine imposed by the Stalinist regime in Ukraine in 1932–1933, can be interpreted as genocide in accordance with the provisions of international law. Although the Ukrainian people suffered widespread repression by the Soviet authorities, there is some doubt that the famine was planned or used by the central government with the purpose of destroying, at least partially, the Ukrainians as a national or ethnic group. This study highlights that, despite the fact that Holodomor fulfilled the objective criteria of the crime of genocide (actus reus), it does not fully meet the subjective criteria (mens rea) and is, thus, outside the scope of the application of international law for this crime. The main object of Stalinist repression was not the Ukrainians, but the peasantry as a social class, and hence the Holodomor can be placed within broader frameworks of mass repression and state violence that are often associated with crimes against humanity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqaf060
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extermination by Starvation and Genocide in Ukraine, 1932–1933

Leanid Kazyrytski
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Soviet and Russian History
article

Extermination by Starvation and Genocide in Ukraine, 1932–1933

Leanid Kazyrytski
article en

Abstract

Abstract The present work examines whether the Holodomor, the famine imposed by the Stalinist regime in Ukraine in 1932–1933, can be interpreted as genocide in accordance with the provisions of international law. Although the Ukrainian people suffered widespread repression by the Soviet authorities, there is some doubt that the famine was planned or used by the central government with the purpose of destroying, at least partially, the Ukrainians as a national or ethnic group. This study highlights that, despite the fact that Holodomor fulfilled the objective criteria of the crime of genocide (actus reus), it does not fully meet the subjective criteria (mens rea) and is, thus, outside the scope of the application of international law for this crime. The main object of Stalinist repression was not the Ukrainians, but the peasantry as a social class, and hence the Holodomor can be placed within broader frameworks of mass repression and state violence that are often associated with crimes against humanity.

Journal of International Criminal Justice
Universitat de Girona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Extermination by Starvation and Genocide in Ukraine, 1932–1933 — Leanid Kazyrytski · Journal of International Criminal Justice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS