Evaluation of fusion status after spine fusion surgery: a comprehensive review

Accurate assessment of fusion status following spinal fusion surgery is paramount, as it closely relates to patient outcomes and quality of life. Multiple imaging modalities have been developed to evaluate fusion, each with distinct advantages and limitations. Plain radiography remains the most accessible and practical method, with dynamic flexion-extension radiographs providing reasonably reliable information on segmental motion and stability. Computed tomography offers superior spatial resolution and enables direct visualization of trabecular bone bridging between vertebral segments, making it the most accurate modality for confirming fusion. Magnetic resonance imaging and radionuclide imaging can serve as complementary techniques, particularly when conventional methods are inconclusive or contraindicated. This review summarizes the strengths and limitations of each imaging modality used for assessing spinal fusion. It also highlights recent technological advances and emerging diagnostic approaches that may enhance the objectivity, reliability, and accuracy of fusion assessment in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Spine Journal
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0465
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of fusion status after spine fusion surgery: a comprehensive review

Ryo Yamamura, Yusuke Dodo, Yoshifumi Kudo, Se G. Lee et al.
Asian Spine Journal
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Evaluation of fusion status after spine fusion surgery: a comprehensive review

Ryo Yamamura, Yusuke Dodo, Yoshifumi Kudo, Se G. Lee, Ichiro Okano, Wook-Tae Park, Takahiro Hirano
article en

Abstract

Accurate assessment of fusion status following spinal fusion surgery is paramount, as it closely relates to patient outcomes and quality of life. Multiple imaging modalities have been developed to evaluate fusion, each with distinct advantages and limitations. Plain radiography remains the most accessible and practical method, with dynamic flexion-extension radiographs providing reasonably reliable information on segmental motion and stability. Computed tomography offers superior spatial resolution and enables direct visualization of trabecular bone bridging between vertebral segments, making it the most accurate modality for confirming fusion. Magnetic resonance imaging and radionuclide imaging can serve as complementary techniques, particularly when conventional methods are inconclusive or contraindicated. This review summarizes the strengths and limitations of each imaging modality used for assessing spinal fusion. It also highlights recent technological advances and emerging diagnostic approaches that may enhance the objectivity, reliability, and accuracy of fusion assessment in the future.

Asian Spine Journal
SHOWA Medical University (JP), Quantitative BioSciences (US), Yeungnam University Medical Center (KR), SHOWA Medical University Hospital (JP), Yeungnam University College
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of fusion status after spine fusion surgery: a comprehensive review — Ryo Yamamura, Yusuke Dodo, et al. · Asian Spine Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS