Evolution of Spanning Tree Protocol: From STP to SPB and Trill – A Comparative Analysis

Abstract The Spanning Tree Protocol (STP), standardized in IEEE 802.1D, has served as the foundational loop-prevention mechanism in bridged Ethernet networks for over three decades. Despite its widespread adoption, STP exhibits significant limitations with respect to convergence time, bandwidth utilization, and scalability that are increasingly incompatible with the demands of modern enterprise and data center networks. This paper presents a structured comparative analysis of five major Layer 2 protocols in the STP lineage: STP (IEEE 802.1D), Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP, IEEE 802.1w), Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP, IEEE 802.1s), Shortest Path Bridging (SPB, IEEE 802.1aq), and Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL, RFC 6325). The analysis is conducted along four primary dimensions: convergence time, scalability, operational complexity, and security considerations. Drawing exclusively on peer-reviewed literature, IETF/IEEE standards, and published operational benchmarks, the paper concludes with a structured evaluation of the relevance of these protocols in Software-Defined Networking (SDN) environments and modern Ethernet fabric architectures, proposing a conceptual decision framework for protocol selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œScientific Bulletin of Electrical Engineering Faculty
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/sbeef-2025-0018
Primary Topic
Software-Defined Networks and 5G
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution of Spanning Tree Protocol: From STP to SPB and Trill – A Comparative Analysis

Adrian Tudoroiu
˜The œScientific Bulletin of Electrical Engineering Faculty
Software-Defined Networks and 5G
article

Evolution of Spanning Tree Protocol: From STP to SPB and Trill – A Comparative Analysis

Adrian Tudoroiu
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Spanning Tree Protocol (STP), standardized in IEEE 802.1D, has served as the foundational loop-prevention mechanism in bridged Ethernet networks for over three decades. Despite its widespread adoption, STP exhibits significant limitations with respect to convergence time, bandwidth utilization, and scalability that are increasingly incompatible with the demands of modern enterprise and data center networks. This paper presents a structured comparative analysis of five major Layer 2 protocols in the STP lineage: STP (IEEE 802.1D), Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP, IEEE 802.1w), Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP, IEEE 802.1s), Shortest Path Bridging (SPB, IEEE 802.1aq), and Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL, RFC 6325). The analysis is conducted along four primary dimensions: convergence time, scalability, operational complexity, and security considerations. Drawing exclusively on peer-reviewed literature, IETF/IEEE standards, and published operational benchmarks, the paper concludes with a structured evaluation of the relevance of these protocols in Software-Defined Networking (SDN) environments and modern Ethernet fabric architectures, proposing a conceptual decision framework for protocol selection.

˜The œScientific Bulletin of Electrical Engineering FacultyVol. 25(2)
Valahia University of Targoviste (RO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Software-Defined Networks and 5G
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.