Exploring the strengths and limitations of AI-driven variant prioritization versus manual curation in inborn errors of immunity

Our results show that AI-driven tools are powerful for detecting clearly pathogenic variants and can markedly accelerate the diagnostic process. However, their strong reliance on curated databases, limited incorporation of phenotypic data, and challenges in handling VUS may reduce their effectiveness. Enhancing phenotype integration, expanding annotations (including non-coding regions), and incorporating up-to-date literature could improve their performance. Ultimately, AI tools should complement expert curation, with future models evolving toward integrative approaches that better capture the complexity of human disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2026.1713299
Primary Topic
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the strengths and limitations of AI-driven variant prioritization versus manual curation in inborn errors of immunity

Elena Pérez-Estevez, Laith Ibrahim Moushib, Janire Perurena-Prieto, Andrea Martín-Nalda et al.
Frontiers in Genetics
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
article

Exploring the strengths and limitations of AI-driven variant prioritization versus manual curation in inborn errors of immunity

Elena Pérez-Estevez, Laith Ibrahim Moushib, Janire Perurena-Prieto, Andrea Martín-Nalda, Blanca Urban, Roger Colobran, Pere Soler-Palacín, Aina Aguiló-Cucurull, Romina Dieli-Crimi, Nerea Moreno-Ruiz, Xavier Solanich, Laura Batlle-Masó
article en

Abstract

Our results show that AI-driven tools are powerful for detecting clearly pathogenic variants and can markedly accelerate the diagnostic process. However, their strong reliance on curated databases, limited incorporation of phenotypic data, and challenges in handling VUS may reduce their effectiveness. Enhancing phenotype integration, expanding annotations (including non-coding regions), and incorporating up-to-date literature could improve their performance. Ultimately, AI tools should complement expert curation, with future models evolving toward integrative approaches that better capture the complexity of human disorders.

Frontiers in GeneticsVol. 17
Hebron University (PS), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Mustansiriyah University (IQ), Bellvitge University Hospital (ES), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES), Hospital de Cruces (ES), Jeffrey Modell Foundation (AU), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the strengths and limitations of AI-driven variant prioritization versus manual curation in inborn errors of immunity — Elena Pérez-Estevez, Laith Ibrahim Moushib, et al. · Frontiers in Genetics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS