Neurocosmetics or Hype? Psychobiotic Potential of Strain-Specific Cosmeceuticals

<b>Background:</b> There is increasing interest in cosmeceuticals-cosmetic regimes incorporating a specific probiotic or postbiotic strain, fully characterized genetically and phenotypically-which, when topically applied, have the ability to modulate the skin microbiome, exhibit anti-inflammatory properties and improve the overall skin appearance by reducing signs of aging. In addition, claims have been made that emotional and psychological well-being can be improved by neuroactive substances released by the probiotics in cosmeceuticals, acting via the skin-brain axis. However, claims are somewhat generalized and imprecise, and we deemed it important to look more precisely at published research relating to cosmeceuticals. There have been very few research publications on these products, identified as neurocosmetics, and they immediately provoked strong reactions from dermatologists and psychiatrists, mainly with regard to the ethical and safety aspects of their use. <b>Objectives/Method:</b> The present strain-centered literature evaluation aimed to select from peer-reviewed publications referring to cosmeceuticals only those dealing with fully characterized, specific probiotic strains with documented beneficial skin properties. Eligible strains found were subsequently subjected to a secondary search to ascertain whether they also demonstrated clinical, or even experimental, evidence of strain-specific psychobiotic properties. <b>Results:</b> From 33 strain-specific cosmeceuticals identified, only three strains-<i>Lactococcus lactis</i> subsp. <i>cremoris</i> H61, <i>Limosilactobacillus reuteri</i> DSM 17938, and <i>Weizmannia coagulans</i> MTCC 5856-demonstrated reproducible evidence of psychobiotic potential. <b>Conclusions:</b> Current evidence does not support the notion that cosmeceuticals are likely to directly modulate emotional states through topical application, since the coexistence of cosmeceutical and psychobiotic properties within the same probiotic strain seems to be both uncommon and highly strain-specific and therefore of little practical, generalized use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18050817
Primary Topic
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurocosmetics or Hype? Psychobiotic Potential of Strain-Specific Cosmeceuticals

A. Ioannidis, Anne D. Shrewsbury, Alexandra-Eleftheria Menni, Ioannis M. Theodorou et al.
Nutrients
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
article

Neurocosmetics or Hype? Psychobiotic Potential of Strain-Specific Cosmeceuticals

A. Ioannidis, Anne D. Shrewsbury, Alexandra-Eleftheria Menni, Ioannis M. Theodorou, Helen Theodorou, George Stavrou, Georgios Tzikos, Joanna Venieri, Eleni Semertzidou
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> There is increasing interest in cosmeceuticals-cosmetic regimes incorporating a specific probiotic or postbiotic strain, fully characterized genetically and phenotypically-which, when topically applied, have the ability to modulate the skin microbiome, exhibit anti-inflammatory properties and improve the overall skin appearance by reducing signs of aging. In addition, claims have been made that emotional and psychological well-being can be improved by neuroactive substances released by the probiotics in cosmeceuticals, acting via the skin-brain axis. However, claims are somewhat generalized and imprecise, and we deemed it important to look more precisely at published research relating to cosmeceuticals. There have been very few research publications on these products, identified as neurocosmetics, and they immediately provoked strong reactions from dermatologists and psychiatrists, mainly with regard to the ethical and safety aspects of their use. <b>Objectives/Method:</b> The present strain-centered literature evaluation aimed to select from peer-reviewed publications referring to cosmeceuticals only those dealing with fully characterized, specific probiotic strains with documented beneficial skin properties. Eligible strains found were subsequently subjected to a secondary search to ascertain whether they also demonstrated clinical, or even experimental, evidence of strain-specific psychobiotic properties. <b>Results:</b> From 33 strain-specific cosmeceuticals identified, only three strains-<i>Lactococcus lactis</i> subsp. <i>cremoris</i> H61, <i>Limosilactobacillus reuteri</i> DSM 17938, and <i>Weizmannia coagulans</i> MTCC 5856-demonstrated reproducible evidence of psychobiotic potential. <b>Conclusions:</b> Current evidence does not support the notion that cosmeceuticals are likely to directly modulate emotional states through topical application, since the coexistence of cosmeceutical and psychobiotic properties within the same probiotic strain seems to be both uncommon and highly strain-specific and therefore of little practical, generalized use.

NutrientsVol. 18(5)
University of Crete (GR), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), AHEPA University Hospital (GR), Association of Research Libraries (US), NIMTS Hospital (GR), Crete University Press (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.