Fire severity and carbon combustion from tussock tundra fires in Southwest Alaska

Abstract Major advances have been made in understanding carbon emissions from boreal forest fires, yet substantial knowledge gaps remain for tundra fires. Tundra ecosystems are increasingly susceptible to fire activity due to climate change, posing a threat to their large organic soil carbon stocks and the permafrost they insulate. Additionally, studies assessing remote sensing fire severity metrics in tundra landscapes are limited. Here, we report carbon (C) combustion estimates from two large tussock tundra fires (1048 km 2 ) that occurred in Southwest Alaska, USA, in 2022. We quantified above- and belowground carbon stocks and combustion (in kg C m −2 ) at 45 field plots (36 burned, 9 unburned) 1 year post-fire. Soil burn depth was determined using paired moss patches, and aboveground carbon stocks were calculated using allometric equations for shrubs and tussocks. Fire severity was estimated using the field-based geometrically structured composite burn index (GeoCBI) at these 45 plots and at 41 additional plots where only GeoCBI was measured. We upscaled our field-based findings using the differenced normalized burn ratio (dNBR) derived from Sentinel-2 imagery. Tussock tundra landscapes emitted an average of (±standard deviation) 1.59 ± 0.55 kg C m −2 , consuming 11% of the total pre-fire carbon stock. The majority of the loss (75%) came from belowground stocks, with an average burn depth of 6.9 ± 2.1 cm. By scaling carbon combustion with the dNBR ( R 2 = 0.42, p < 0.001), we estimated total carbon emissions from tussock tundra across both fires at 0.81 ± 0.22 Tg. GeoCBI estimates were moderately correlated with the dNBR ( R 2 = 0.63, p < 0.001) across vegetation types. This work provides important information on the impacts of fires on the carbon balance of tundra ecosystems and demonstrates that dNBR, a well-established remote sensing proxy for forest fires, is also effective for mapping fire severity in tundra landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Climate
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ae4cc3
Primary Topic
Climate change and permafrost
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fire severity and carbon combustion from tussock tundra fires in Southwest Alaska

Thomas D. Hessilt, Sonam Wangchuk, Max J. van Gerrevink, Lucas Ribeiro Diaz et al.
Environmental Research Climate
Climate change and permafrost
article

Fire severity and carbon combustion from tussock tundra fires in Southwest Alaska

Thomas D. Hessilt, Sonam Wangchuk, Max J. van Gerrevink, Lucas Ribeiro Diaz, Lisa Saperstein, Rebecca C. Scholten, Thomas Albert Jacobus Janssen, Clement J. F. Delcourt, Sander Veraverbeke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Major advances have been made in understanding carbon emissions from boreal forest fires, yet substantial knowledge gaps remain for tundra fires. Tundra ecosystems are increasingly susceptible to fire activity due to climate change, posing a threat to their large organic soil carbon stocks and the permafrost they insulate. Additionally, studies assessing remote sensing fire severity metrics in tundra landscapes are limited. Here, we report carbon (C) combustion estimates from two large tussock tundra fires (1048 km 2 ) that occurred in Southwest Alaska, USA, in 2022. We quantified above- and belowground carbon stocks and combustion (in kg C m −2 ) at 45 field plots (36 burned, 9 unburned) 1 year post-fire. Soil burn depth was determined using paired moss patches, and aboveground carbon stocks were calculated using allometric equations for shrubs and tussocks. Fire severity was estimated using the field-based geometrically structured composite burn index (GeoCBI) at these 45 plots and at 41 additional plots where only GeoCBI was measured. We upscaled our field-based findings using the differenced normalized burn ratio (dNBR) derived from Sentinel-2 imagery. Tussock tundra landscapes emitted an average of (±standard deviation) 1.59 ± 0.55 kg C m −2 , consuming 11% of the total pre-fire carbon stock. The majority of the loss (75%) came from belowground stocks, with an average burn depth of 6.9 ± 2.1 cm. By scaling carbon combustion with the dNBR ( R 2 = 0.42, p < 0.001), we estimated total carbon emissions from tussock tundra across both fires at 0.81 ± 0.22 Tg. GeoCBI estimates were moderately correlated with the dNBR ( R 2 = 0.63, p < 0.001) across vegetation types. This work provides important information on the impacts of fires on the carbon balance of tundra ecosystems and demonstrates that dNBR, a well-established remote sensing proxy for forest fires, is also effective for mapping fire severity in tundra landscapes.

Environmental Research ClimateVol. 5(2)
Alaska Department of Fish and Game (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Nepal Development Research Institute (NP), Alaska Wildlife Alliance (US), UC Irvine Health (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Commission, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Climate change and permafrost
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.