Comparison of endoleak diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography angiography after endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm
and misdiagnosed by CTA, while one patient had Type 3 endoleak and three patients had Type 2 endoleak also misdiagnosed by CTA.CEUS achieved 97.14% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% PPV, 85.71% NPV, and 0.9857 AUC, outperforming CTA (78.57% sensitivity, 46.15% specificity, 75.86%PPV, 50% NPV, 0.6621 AUC) (p = 0.0033).Mean AAA sac diameter measurements between CEUS and CTA were comparable (p = 0.277). Conclusions:CEUS imaging outperformed CTA for endograft visualization and endoleak diagnosis, in line with similar European studies.Real-time temporal visualization of endoleaks and elimination of iodinated contrast with CEUS exams give endovascular surgeons a beneficial complement to CTA to detect endograft endoleaks and optimize endovascular treatments during long-term follow-up of post-EVAR AAA patients.
Authors
- Dipankar Mukherjee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-6303)
- David J. Spinosa
- Madison Catalanotto Maas
- Arjun Jagdeesh
- Ved Kumar
- Nigel Thomas
- Carolyn Isham
- Seong Hoon Park
- Simon Trigger
Institutions
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Inova Fairfax Hospital (US)
- Society of Interventional Radiology (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques
- Published
- 2026-03-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2026.102211
- Primary Topic
- Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00