EVALUATING THEATER WORKSHOPS AND THEIR CHALLENGES: GOAL ADJUSTMENT IN PRACTICE

This paper aims to evaluate theater workshops, focusing on goal adjustment through practice. The study highlights the unique challenges inherent in assessing workshops, much like other similar practices such as active learning. Traditional evaluation methods often fall short in capturing the holistic and process-driven outcomes of workshops. Using a case study of a workshop at Kawamo Elementary School, the collaborative efforts between external facilitators and regular school teachers are discussed. The study found the following: evaluation criteria are generated through the workshop process, emphasizing participants’ experiences and active participation. Multiple criteria and evaluators allow for mutual adjustment, leading to more accurate and context-specific standards. Spatial separation between practice and evaluation requires continual verification and adjustment of criteria, demonstrating the importance of adaptive evaluation. Future research could continue to refine these methods to enhance their applicability and effectiveness in various educational contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PSYCHOLOGIA
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.d-24-00021
Primary Topic
Economic and Industrial Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATING THEATER WORKSHOPS AND THEIR CHALLENGES: GOAL ADJUSTMENT IN PRACTICE

Junro Shibata, Keiko Hori, Akiko Kamimoto, Eriko Suenaga et al.
PSYCHOLOGIA
Economic and Industrial Development
article

EVALUATING THEATER WORKSHOPS AND THEIR CHALLENGES: GOAL ADJUSTMENT IN PRACTICE

Junro Shibata, Keiko Hori, Akiko Kamimoto, Eriko Suenaga, RENGYO
article en

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate theater workshops, focusing on goal adjustment through practice. The study highlights the unique challenges inherent in assessing workshops, much like other similar practices such as active learning. Traditional evaluation methods often fall short in capturing the holistic and process-driven outcomes of workshops. Using a case study of a workshop at Kawamo Elementary School, the collaborative efforts between external facilitators and regular school teachers are discussed. The study found the following: evaluation criteria are generated through the workshop process, emphasizing participants’ experiences and active participation. Multiple criteria and evaluators allow for mutual adjustment, leading to more accurate and context-specific standards. Spatial separation between practice and evaluation requires continual verification and adjustment of criteria, demonstrating the importance of adaptive evaluation. Future research could continue to refine these methods to enhance their applicability and effectiveness in various educational contexts.

PSYCHOLOGIA
Ritsumeikan University (JP), University of Shiga Prefecture (JP), Kyoto University (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Economic and Industrial Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.