Electroconvulsive Therapy as an Adjunctive Treatment for Clozapine-Resistant Schizophrenia

Clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS) is a severe condition with limited therapeutic options. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been proposed as augmentation, but its efficacy remains uncertain due to methodological limitations and inconsistent findings. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of ECT as an adjunctive treatment in CRS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases were searched up to March 2025. The primary outcome was clinical response, defined in each RCT as a ≥40% to 50% reduction in positive psychotic symptoms. Secondary outcomes included response at ≥20% reduction, changes in negative/general symptoms, adverse effects, and dropouts. Three RCTs (102 participants) were included, two with sham-ECT controls. ECT significantly increased response compared with control for the primary outcome (RR = 5.63; 95% CI: 1.00 to 31.57; P = 0.04; I² = 0%), but showed no difference at the ≥20% threshold (RR = 1.96; 95% CI: 0.45 to 8.44; P = 0.36; I² = 55%). Other secondary outcomes were not pooled due to heterogeneity. ECT was generally well tolerated, with a low dropout rate. The primary outcome was driven by one large-effect study without sham-ECT and using clozapine monotherapy as control, while sham-controlled studies showed no significant benefit. The absence of differences at the ≥20% response threshold likely reflects the sham-ECT effects. Although underpowered, this outcome was reported to discuss active placebo effects. Given CRS severity and limited options, ECT may still be considered in selected cases, but further high-quality sham-controlled RCTs with standardized protocols are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ect
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/yct.0000000000001237
Primary Topic
Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electroconvulsive Therapy as an Adjunctive Treatment for Clozapine-Resistant Schizophrenia

Lais Soares Ker Marques, Lucas Mendonça de Araújo Bellesi, Felipe Mendonça Rocha Barros, Arthur Tolentino et al.
Journal of Ect
Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
article

Electroconvulsive Therapy as an Adjunctive Treatment for Clozapine-Resistant Schizophrenia

Lais Soares Ker Marques, Lucas Mendonça de Araújo Bellesi, Felipe Mendonça Rocha Barros, Arthur Tolentino, Marina Guitti de Souza, Paulo Dalgalarrondo, Renata Rosal Lopes da Cruz, Rodolfo Francisco Marques, Liliane Smaniotto, Ary Gadelha, Pedro Gabriel Lorencetti, Pedro Vieira Prado da Silva
article en

Abstract

Clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS) is a severe condition with limited therapeutic options. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been proposed as augmentation, but its efficacy remains uncertain due to methodological limitations and inconsistent findings. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of ECT as an adjunctive treatment in CRS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases were searched up to March 2025. The primary outcome was clinical response, defined in each RCT as a ≥40% to 50% reduction in positive psychotic symptoms. Secondary outcomes included response at ≥20% reduction, changes in negative/general symptoms, adverse effects, and dropouts. Three RCTs (102 participants) were included, two with sham-ECT controls. ECT significantly increased response compared with control for the primary outcome (RR = 5.63; 95% CI: 1.00 to 31.57; P = 0.04; I² = 0%), but showed no difference at the ≥20% threshold (RR = 1.96; 95% CI: 0.45 to 8.44; P = 0.36; I² = 55%). Other secondary outcomes were not pooled due to heterogeneity. ECT was generally well tolerated, with a low dropout rate. The primary outcome was driven by one large-effect study without sham-ECT and using clozapine monotherapy as control, while sham-controlled studies showed no significant benefit. The absence of differences at the ≥20% response threshold likely reflects the sham-ECT effects. Although underpowered, this outcome was reported to discuss active placebo effects. Given CRS severity and limited options, ECT may still be considered in selected cases, but further high-quality sham-controlled RCTs with standardized protocols are required.

Journal of Ect
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.