Public perspectives on food date labeling: implications for waste reduction and food safety policy

• Public comments on food date labels analyzed with text mining. • Eleven themes revealed confusion, clarity, waste, and trust issues. • Framework proposes standardization and education as key pathways. • Insights inform policies to reduce waste and protect from foodborne risks. Confusion about U.S. food date labels contributes to preventable waste and foodborne risk, yet real-world perspectives remain underexplored. This study reviewed and analyzed 744 unique public comments submitted to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2024–2025 Request for Information using a multi-label text-mining approach. Eleven themes emerged; the most prevalent were Food Waste Concerns (56.85%), Support for Label Standardization (55.78%), Label Confusion (53.09%), and Clarity of Language/Suggestions (47.72%). A substantial share of comments also emphasized the Safety versus Quality Distinction (40.99%). Less frequently mentioned themes included Support for Proposal (21.51%), Economic Concerns (15.19%), and Consumer Education (13.71%). Accessibility of Labels (7.66%) and Cultural or Household Practices (7.39%) appeared in a smaller proportion of comments, and Trust in Government or Industry (6.85%) was the least common theme. Building on these findings and prior literature, this study proposes a policy-oriented conceptual framework that includes two pathways for policy action. The first pathway is standardization, emphasizing consistent, visible, and practicable labeling formats that differentiate quality from safety and account for product-category context. The second pathway is education, emphasizing evidence-informed, audience-tailored programs integrated with communication strategies and practical guidance. By situating public voices within ongoing regulatory debates, this study contributes to food policy discussions on labeling reform. The results carry international relevance given global efforts to harmonize date labeling standards and strengthen food system sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Policy
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103055
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public perspectives on food date labeling: implications for waste reduction and food safety policy

Shuai Ma, Lulu Mao, Zhihong Xu, Xiting Zhuang et al.
Food Policy
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
article

Public perspectives on food date labeling: implications for waste reduction and food safety policy

Shuai Ma, Lulu Mao, Zhihong Xu, Xiting Zhuang, Peng Lu
article en

Abstract

• Public comments on food date labels analyzed with text mining. • Eleven themes revealed confusion, clarity, waste, and trust issues. • Framework proposes standardization and education as key pathways. • Insights inform policies to reduce waste and protect from foodborne risks. Confusion about U.S. food date labels contributes to preventable waste and foodborne risk, yet real-world perspectives remain underexplored. This study reviewed and analyzed 744 unique public comments submitted to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2024–2025 Request for Information using a multi-label text-mining approach. Eleven themes emerged; the most prevalent were Food Waste Concerns (56.85%), Support for Label Standardization (55.78%), Label Confusion (53.09%), and Clarity of Language/Suggestions (47.72%). A substantial share of comments also emphasized the Safety versus Quality Distinction (40.99%). Less frequently mentioned themes included Support for Proposal (21.51%), Economic Concerns (15.19%), and Consumer Education (13.71%). Accessibility of Labels (7.66%) and Cultural or Household Practices (7.39%) appeared in a smaller proportion of comments, and Trust in Government or Industry (6.85%) was the least common theme. Building on these findings and prior literature, this study proposes a policy-oriented conceptual framework that includes two pathways for policy action. The first pathway is standardization, emphasizing consistent, visible, and practicable labeling formats that differentiate quality from safety and account for product-category context. The second pathway is education, emphasizing evidence-informed, audience-tailored programs integrated with communication strategies and practical guidance. By situating public voices within ongoing regulatory debates, this study contributes to food policy discussions on labeling reform. The results carry international relevance given global efforts to harmonize date labeling standards and strengthen food system sustainability.

Food PolicyVol. 140
University of Georgia (US), Texas College (US), North Dakota State University (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.