Why Don’t Historical Memories Fade Over Time? Unveiling the Paradox and Incomplete Triangle of International Reconciliation

Historical memory shapes individual and collective identities, with long-lasting effects on relations between countries. This study explores the enduring impact of historical memory on international relations, focusing on recent events in Northeast Asia, including the South Korean boycott of Japanese goods and the rise of anti-Japanese sentiment in China. Specifically, it investigates why collective memories, especially those related to past conflicts and atrocities, do not fade with time, but intensify sometimes, affecting diplomatic ties. The theoretical framework employs the “International Reconciliation Triangle,” encompassing legal, moral, and political processes. The study delves into the role of collective memory, intergenerational transmission, and the selective nature of collective forgetting. Moreover, it analyzes the complex interplay between legal mechanisms, moral acknowledgement, and political leadership in fostering or hindering reconciliation. The results have theoretical implications, as they challenge existing theories by examining the proactive role played by the younger generation in recent anti-Japanese movements. Additionally, they question the assumptions around the ease of reconciliation as collective memories fade.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives Global Local Political
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251367372
Primary Topic
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Don’t Historical Memories Fade Over Time? Unveiling the Paradox and Incomplete Triangle of International Reconciliation

Jahyun Chun
Alternatives Global Local Political
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
article

Why Don’t Historical Memories Fade Over Time? Unveiling the Paradox and Incomplete Triangle of International Reconciliation

Jahyun Chun
article en

Abstract

Historical memory shapes individual and collective identities, with long-lasting effects on relations between countries. This study explores the enduring impact of historical memory on international relations, focusing on recent events in Northeast Asia, including the South Korean boycott of Japanese goods and the rise of anti-Japanese sentiment in China. Specifically, it investigates why collective memories, especially those related to past conflicts and atrocities, do not fade with time, but intensify sometimes, affecting diplomatic ties. The theoretical framework employs the “International Reconciliation Triangle,” encompassing legal, moral, and political processes. The study delves into the role of collective memory, intergenerational transmission, and the selective nature of collective forgetting. Moreover, it analyzes the complex interplay between legal mechanisms, moral acknowledgement, and political leadership in fostering or hindering reconciliation. The results have theoretical implications, as they challenge existing theories by examining the proactive role played by the younger generation in recent anti-Japanese movements. Additionally, they question the assumptions around the ease of reconciliation as collective memories fade.

Alternatives Global Local Political
Yonsei University (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.