Clinical Validation of Object Detection Models for AI-Based Pressure Injury Stage Classification

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Pressure injury stage classification was performed using object detection models to address inconsistencies in clinical assessment due to variability in nurses' experience and education levels. <b>Methods</b>: A dataset of 1282 pressure injury images from a medical institution was used to train and compare five representative architectures, YOLOv5x, YOLOv7, YOLOv8x, YOLOv8n, and YOLOv11x, and Faster R-CNN across Stages 1-4, excluding Deep Tissue Injury and unclassified cases. A mobile application incorporating YOLOv7 was deployed at Eulji University Daejeon Medical Center and tested by 10 nurses over 2 weeks, processing 46 cases. <b>Results</b>: YOLOv7 demonstrated superior performance with [email protected] of 0.97 and [email protected]:0.95 of 0.68, achieving 93% accuracy for Stage 2 classification, the most challenging diagnostic category. Clinical validation demonstrated 87% diagnostic accuracy, 4.0/5 user satisfaction, and workflow improvement with assessment time reduced from 4-6 min to 1 min. The application proved valuable as both a diagnostic support tool and educational resource for novice nurses, with zero critical misclassifications recorded. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study establishes the practical utility of AI-based pressure injury classification systems in clinical practice and their potential for enhancing nursing competency and workflow efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16050747
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Validation of Object Detection Models for AI-Based Pressure Injury Stage Classification

Jun-Woo Choi, Dong-Hun Han, Sang Hyun Jang, Minsoo Kang et al.
Diagnostics
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

Clinical Validation of Object Detection Models for AI-Based Pressure Injury Stage Classification

Jun-Woo Choi, Dong-Hun Han, Sang Hyun Jang, Minsoo Kang, Kyunghwa Bae, Chunhwa Ihm
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Pressure injury stage classification was performed using object detection models to address inconsistencies in clinical assessment due to variability in nurses' experience and education levels. <b>Methods</b>: A dataset of 1282 pressure injury images from a medical institution was used to train and compare five representative architectures, YOLOv5x, YOLOv7, YOLOv8x, YOLOv8n, and YOLOv11x, and Faster R-CNN across Stages 1-4, excluding Deep Tissue Injury and unclassified cases. A mobile application incorporating YOLOv7 was deployed at Eulji University Daejeon Medical Center and tested by 10 nurses over 2 weeks, processing 46 cases. <b>Results</b>: YOLOv7 demonstrated superior performance with [email protected] of 0.97 and [email protected]:0.95 of 0.68, achieving 93% accuracy for Stage 2 classification, the most challenging diagnostic category. Clinical validation demonstrated 87% diagnostic accuracy, 4.0/5 user satisfaction, and workflow improvement with assessment time reduced from 4-6 min to 1 min. The application proved valuable as both a diagnostic support tool and educational resource for novice nurses, with zero critical misclassifications recorded. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study establishes the practical utility of AI-based pressure injury classification systems in clinical practice and their potential for enhancing nursing competency and workflow efficiency.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(5)
Daejeon University (KR), Eulji University (KR), Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University (KR)
Eulji University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.