Holistic framework to control ultrasonic cavitation in liquid media based on a systematic review

The management of acoustic cavitation is crucial for enhancing the performance of optimised sonoreactors in various fields. With a growing interest in eco-friendly methods employing sono-reactors, the assessment of cavitation caused by ultrasonic devices is increasingly significant. Controlling cavitation is vital to maximise energy efficiency and its related impacts. Currently, traditional measurement methods include physical techniques (such as aluminium foil tests and calorimetry), optical methods (such as high-speed imaging, sonoluminescence, and particle image velocimetry), chemical approaches (including fluorescence and dosimetry), as well as acoustic methods (like hydrophones and active cavitation detectors). However, each of these methodologies possesses inherent limitations that can compromise measurement accuracy, lead to unnecessary costs, and result in a lack of methodological rigour. This review suggests an organised framework designed to assist in selecting the most suitable technique from the widely used methods, tailored to different application contexts. The framework includes application-specific questions derived from the review, helping to pinpoint methods that meet specific requirements. • Framework defined to improve the selection of techniques for acoustic cavitation control. • Control acoustic cavitation mainly relies on acoustic, physical, chemical, or optical methods. • Optical methods combined with acoustic ones are most common. Cross-methods improve assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2026.121040
Primary Topic
Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holistic framework to control ultrasonic cavitation in liquid media based on a systematic review

Paulo J. Ramísio, H. Puga, Stijn WH Van Hulle, José Fernandes
Measurement
Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
article

Holistic framework to control ultrasonic cavitation in liquid media based on a systematic review

Paulo J. Ramísio, H. Puga, Stijn WH Van Hulle, José Fernandes
article en

Abstract

The management of acoustic cavitation is crucial for enhancing the performance of optimised sonoreactors in various fields. With a growing interest in eco-friendly methods employing sono-reactors, the assessment of cavitation caused by ultrasonic devices is increasingly significant. Controlling cavitation is vital to maximise energy efficiency and its related impacts. Currently, traditional measurement methods include physical techniques (such as aluminium foil tests and calorimetry), optical methods (such as high-speed imaging, sonoluminescence, and particle image velocimetry), chemical approaches (including fluorescence and dosimetry), as well as acoustic methods (like hydrophones and active cavitation detectors). However, each of these methodologies possesses inherent limitations that can compromise measurement accuracy, lead to unnecessary costs, and result in a lack of methodological rigour. This review suggests an organised framework designed to assist in selecting the most suitable technique from the widely used methods, tailored to different application contexts. The framework includes application-specific questions derived from the review, helping to pinpoint methods that meet specific requirements. • Framework defined to improve the selection of techniques for acoustic cavitation control. • Control acoustic cavitation mainly relies on acoustic, physical, chemical, or optical methods. • Optical methods combined with acoustic ones are most common. Cross-methods improve assessment.

MeasurementVol. 272
Ghent University (BE), Centre for Advanced Process Technology for Urban Resource Recovery (BE), University of Minho (PT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.