Coding and Validation for Breadth and Desirability of 1,214 English Adjectives

Adjectives are essential in how people describe, evaluate, and reason about others. They differ along meaningful semantic dimensions such as desirability (e.g., "friendly" is more positive than "rude") and breadth (e.g., "punctual" is narrower than "reliable"). Adjectival breadth has received limited empirical attention, partly because existing resources are sparse and outdated. We introduce a new database with subjective ratings from approximately 1,500 Americans for 1,214 adjectives on both breadth and desirability. Unlike existing resources, this updated database is more comprehensive and diverse, allowing for detailed analysis of adjectival use in academic and applied contexts. We validate this database with a large-scale analysis of online product reviews, showing how variation in adjective breadth is a common feature of natural language use. This database should prove valuable for research on semantic representation, social inference, and evaluative communication across various fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Data
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06934-9
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coding and Validation for Breadth and Desirability of 1,214 English Adjectives

Rick K. Dale, Steven J. Stroessner, Lin L. Lin
Scientific Data
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

Coding and Validation for Breadth and Desirability of 1,214 English Adjectives

Rick K. Dale, Steven J. Stroessner, Lin L. Lin
article en

Abstract

Adjectives are essential in how people describe, evaluate, and reason about others. They differ along meaningful semantic dimensions such as desirability (e.g., "friendly" is more positive than "rude") and breadth (e.g., "punctual" is narrower than "reliable"). Adjectival breadth has received limited empirical attention, partly because existing resources are sparse and outdated. We introduce a new database with subjective ratings from approximately 1,500 Americans for 1,214 adjectives on both breadth and desirability. Unlike existing resources, this updated database is more comprehensive and diverse, allowing for detailed analysis of adjectival use in academic and applied contexts. We validate this database with a large-scale analysis of online product reviews, showing how variation in adjective breadth is a common feature of natural language use. This database should prove valuable for research on semantic representation, social inference, and evaluative communication across various fields.

Scientific Data
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Coding and Validation for Breadth and Desirability of 1,214 English Adjectives — Rick K. Dale, Steven J. Stroessner, et al. · Scientific Data (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS