Comparison of the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation or sintilimab and bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality. For patients with unresectable HCC, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or systemic therapy (e.g., sintilimab and bevacizumab) are emerging strategies. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE-RFA versus TACE combined with sintilimab and bevacizumab in unresectable HCC. This retrospective cohort study included 207 patients with unresectable HCC treated from January 2021 to June 2022: 93 received TACE combined RFA and 114 received TACE combined sintilimab and bevacizumab. Baseline characteristics, laboratory parameters, tumor response, adverse events, and survival outcomes (overall survival [OS] and progression-free survival [PFS]) were analyzed. Statistical analyses employed t-tests, χ² tests, Kaplan-Meier/log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression to identify independent prognostic factors. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The TACE+dual-drug group achieved a higher objective response rate (ORR: 38.60% vs. 24.73%, P = 0.034) and superior survival outcomes, with longer median OS (27.24 vs. 24.17 months, P < 0.001) and PFS (10.42 vs. 8.13 months, P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression identified treatment group and BCLC stage as independent predictors of OS. Compared to TACE + RFA, TACE+dual-drug therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of death (HR = 0.520, 95% CI: 0.370–0.731, P < 0.001), while BCLC stage C increased the risk of death (HR = 2.106, 95% CI: 1.412–3.146, P < 0.001). Regarding safety, the dual-drug group exhibited more pronounced hematological suppression, coagulopathy, and hepatic dysfunction (P < 0.05). Adverse events (hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, rash) were significantly more common in the TACE+dual-drug group (P < 0.01). TACE combined with sintilimab and bevacizumab improves survival and tumor response over TACE-RFA but with increased systemic toxicity. Patient selection should balance efficacy and tolerability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-04672-1
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation or sintilimab and bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Chengbin Dong, Yang Song, Miaomiao Li, Tingting Li et al.
BMC Gastroenterology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Comparison of the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation or sintilimab and bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Chengbin Dong, Yang Song, Miaomiao Li, Tingting Li, Hongyi Zhao
article en

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality. For patients with unresectable HCC, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or systemic therapy (e.g., sintilimab and bevacizumab) are emerging strategies. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE-RFA versus TACE combined with sintilimab and bevacizumab in unresectable HCC. This retrospective cohort study included 207 patients with unresectable HCC treated from January 2021 to June 2022: 93 received TACE combined RFA and 114 received TACE combined sintilimab and bevacizumab. Baseline characteristics, laboratory parameters, tumor response, adverse events, and survival outcomes (overall survival [OS] and progression-free survival [PFS]) were analyzed. Statistical analyses employed t-tests, χ² tests, Kaplan-Meier/log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression to identify independent prognostic factors. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The TACE+dual-drug group achieved a higher objective response rate (ORR: 38.60% vs. 24.73%, P = 0.034) and superior survival outcomes, with longer median OS (27.24 vs. 24.17 months, P < 0.001) and PFS (10.42 vs. 8.13 months, P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression identified treatment group and BCLC stage as independent predictors of OS. Compared to TACE + RFA, TACE+dual-drug therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of death (HR = 0.520, 95% CI: 0.370–0.731, P < 0.001), while BCLC stage C increased the risk of death (HR = 2.106, 95% CI: 1.412–3.146, P < 0.001). Regarding safety, the dual-drug group exhibited more pronounced hematological suppression, coagulopathy, and hepatic dysfunction (P < 0.05). Adverse events (hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, rash) were significantly more common in the TACE+dual-drug group (P < 0.01). TACE combined with sintilimab and bevacizumab improves survival and tumor response over TACE-RFA but with increased systemic toxicity. Patient selection should balance efficacy and tolerability.

BMC Gastroenterology
Beijing Shijitan Hospital (CN), Beijing Haidian Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.