Predictive value of QT interval correction formulas for all-cause mortality in patients with left bundle branch block

QT prolongation is recognized as a prognostic marker associated with poor clinical outcomes and is frequently observed in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, the identification of QT prolongation in LBBB patients remains challenging. Although multiple QT correction formulas have been specifically developed for LBBB, the prognostic significance and predictive value of these corrected QT intervals in LBBB patients have not been conclusively established. This retrospective cohort study consecutively enrolled LBBB patients from 2011 to 2021. The exclusion criteria comprised patients with persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter, atrioventricular block, right ventricular pacing, atypical LBBB morphology and malignant tumor. Comprehensive data collection included electrocardiographic parameters, biochemical profiles, and clinical characteristics for all-cause mortality analysis. Five established QT correction (QTc) formulas (Rautaharju, Yankelson, Wang, Bogossian, and Colunga) were applied to calculate QTc intervals in LBBB patients. During a median follow-up time of 5.1 ± 2.9 years, the overall mortality rate was 21.50% (106/493), with differential rates observed between cardiology (18.32%, 74/404) and non-cardiology (35.96%, 32/89) subgroups. Multivariable regression analysis identified age, left ventricular ejection fraction, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease as significant predictors of all-cause mortality following adjustment. Cardiac resynchronization therapy demonstrated consistent protective effects across all five analytical models constructed by each QTc formula. Furthermore, prolonged QTc interval calculated using all 5 formulas was significantly associated with increased mortality risk in multivariable analyses. Among the correction formulas, the Rautaharju formula exhibited superior predictive performance for all-cause mortality (AUC = 0.812, cut-off = 416.59 ms). In this retrospective cohort, patients with LBBB demonstrate substantially elevated mortality rates, particularly in non-cardiology populations, necessitating heightened clinical attention. While our findings demonstrate a robust association between QTc prolongation and all-cause mortality. Among the formulas evaluated, our study identifies the Rautaharju formula as the preferred tool for risk stratification in LBBB patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-05661-8
Primary Topic
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive value of QT interval correction formulas for all-cause mortality in patients with left bundle branch block

Yiheng Yang, Rongqian Xu, X J Dong, Xiaomeng Yin et al.
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
article

Predictive value of QT interval correction formulas for all-cause mortality in patients with left bundle branch block

Yiheng Yang, Rongqian Xu, X J Dong, Xiaomeng Yin, Haolin Song, Yingxue Dong, Yunlong Xia, Lianjun Gao, Rongfeng Zhang
article en

Abstract

QT prolongation is recognized as a prognostic marker associated with poor clinical outcomes and is frequently observed in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, the identification of QT prolongation in LBBB patients remains challenging. Although multiple QT correction formulas have been specifically developed for LBBB, the prognostic significance and predictive value of these corrected QT intervals in LBBB patients have not been conclusively established. This retrospective cohort study consecutively enrolled LBBB patients from 2011 to 2021. The exclusion criteria comprised patients with persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter, atrioventricular block, right ventricular pacing, atypical LBBB morphology and malignant tumor. Comprehensive data collection included electrocardiographic parameters, biochemical profiles, and clinical characteristics for all-cause mortality analysis. Five established QT correction (QTc) formulas (Rautaharju, Yankelson, Wang, Bogossian, and Colunga) were applied to calculate QTc intervals in LBBB patients. During a median follow-up time of 5.1 ± 2.9 years, the overall mortality rate was 21.50% (106/493), with differential rates observed between cardiology (18.32%, 74/404) and non-cardiology (35.96%, 32/89) subgroups. Multivariable regression analysis identified age, left ventricular ejection fraction, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease as significant predictors of all-cause mortality following adjustment. Cardiac resynchronization therapy demonstrated consistent protective effects across all five analytical models constructed by each QTc formula. Furthermore, prolonged QTc interval calculated using all 5 formulas was significantly associated with increased mortality risk in multivariable analyses. Among the correction formulas, the Rautaharju formula exhibited superior predictive performance for all-cause mortality (AUC = 0.812, cut-off = 416.59 ms). In this retrospective cohort, patients with LBBB demonstrate substantially elevated mortality rates, particularly in non-cardiology populations, necessitating heightened clinical attention. While our findings demonstrate a robust association between QTc prolongation and all-cause mortality. Among the formulas evaluated, our study identifies the Rautaharju formula as the preferred tool for risk stratification in LBBB patients.

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Dalian Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.