Do heterogenous beliefs drive the US business cycles?

This paper estimates a Behavioural New Keynesian (BNK) model incorporating belief heterogeneity through a switching mechanism. Agents form expectations using either a forward-looking (rational) or backward-looking (extrapolative) rule, and their weights evolve endogenously based on past forecast performance. To identify the latent structural shocks and the time-varying composition of beliefs over the business cycle, we apply a simulation-based nonlinear filtering and backward smoothing routine, which recovers full-sample paths of unobserved states consistent with both equilibrium restrictions and observed macroeconomic data. Our results show that belief heterogeneity has moderate quantitative effects during normal times but significantly amplifies macroeconomic dynamics during periods of large shocks, such as the COVID-19 crisis. This highlights some limitations of rational expectations models and points to the relevance of endogenous expectation formation for business cycle analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2026.107501
Primary Topic
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do heterogenous beliefs drive the US business cycles?

Guido Cozzi, Fabio Di Dio
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
article

Do heterogenous beliefs drive the US business cycles?

Guido Cozzi, Fabio Di Dio
article en

Abstract

This paper estimates a Behavioural New Keynesian (BNK) model incorporating belief heterogeneity through a switching mechanism. Agents form expectations using either a forward-looking (rational) or backward-looking (extrapolative) rule, and their weights evolve endogenously based on past forecast performance. To identify the latent structural shocks and the time-varying composition of beliefs over the business cycle, we apply a simulation-based nonlinear filtering and backward smoothing routine, which recovers full-sample paths of unobserved states consistent with both equilibrium restrictions and observed macroeconomic data. Our results show that belief heterogeneity has moderate quantitative effects during normal times but significantly amplifies macroeconomic dynamics during periods of large shocks, such as the COVID-19 crisis. This highlights some limitations of rational expectations models and points to the relevance of endogenous expectation formation for business cycle analysis.

Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationVol. 245
University of St.Gallen (CH), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do heterogenous beliefs drive the US business cycles? — Guido Cozzi, Fabio Di Dio · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS