Pluriversal technologies: A decolonial typology of knowledge integration for disruptive sustainability

Amid accelerating socio-ecological crises—climate breakdown, mass extinctions and widening inequalities—there is an urgent need for transformative approaches that address root causes rather than symptoms. Disruptive sustainability seeks such transformations; however, it remains theoretically underdeveloped regarding how radically different knowledge systems can work together across the life-cycle of technologies. Drawing on science and technology studies and decolonial scholarship, we build a decolonial typology of knowledge integration in ‘pluriversal technologies’—technologies co-designed, co-produced and co-owned across epistemic communities. We identify four modes: extractive appropriation, parallel operation, adaptive integration and transformative integration. We demonstrate how each appears along the design, production and ownership dimensions of a technology's life-cycle. This study makes three contributions. First, by demonstrating that a single technology can occupy different integration modes across its life-cycle, it exposes the dimensional unevenness that often derails ostensibly collaborative initiatives. Second, it moves beyond binary treatments of integration to a graded, four-mode framework. Third, it identifies catalytic mechanisms—such as trust building, co-learning, shared governance, recognition and reparation—that enable initiatives to shift between modes. This typology enriches research on disruptive sustainability by clarifying how diverse knowledge systems can collaborate or clash and by mapping routes toward more just, sustainable and effective innovation. • Decolonial typology of knowledge integration in pluriversal technologies • Four modes: extractive, parallel, adaptive and transformative • Integration varies across design, production and ownership phases • Identifies mechanisms enabling shifts between integration modes • Moves sustainability transitions beyond participatory/not-participatory framings

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Policy
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2026.105458
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pluriversal technologies: A decolonial typology of knowledge integration for disruptive sustainability

Koen Beumer, Paola Velasco‐Herrejón, Martin Calisto Friant, Thomas Bauwens
Research Policy
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

Pluriversal technologies: A decolonial typology of knowledge integration for disruptive sustainability

Koen Beumer, Paola Velasco‐Herrejón, Martin Calisto Friant, Thomas Bauwens
article en

Abstract

Amid accelerating socio-ecological crises—climate breakdown, mass extinctions and widening inequalities—there is an urgent need for transformative approaches that address root causes rather than symptoms. Disruptive sustainability seeks such transformations; however, it remains theoretically underdeveloped regarding how radically different knowledge systems can work together across the life-cycle of technologies. Drawing on science and technology studies and decolonial scholarship, we build a decolonial typology of knowledge integration in ‘pluriversal technologies’—technologies co-designed, co-produced and co-owned across epistemic communities. We identify four modes: extractive appropriation, parallel operation, adaptive integration and transformative integration. We demonstrate how each appears along the design, production and ownership dimensions of a technology's life-cycle. This study makes three contributions. First, by demonstrating that a single technology can occupy different integration modes across its life-cycle, it exposes the dimensional unevenness that often derails ostensibly collaborative initiatives. Second, it moves beyond binary treatments of integration to a graded, four-mode framework. Third, it identifies catalytic mechanisms—such as trust building, co-learning, shared governance, recognition and reparation—that enable initiatives to shift between modes. This typology enriches research on disruptive sustainability by clarifying how diverse knowledge systems can collaborate or clash and by mapping routes toward more just, sustainable and effective innovation. • Decolonial typology of knowledge integration in pluriversal technologies • Four modes: extractive, parallel, adaptive and transformative • Integration varies across design, production and ownership phases • Identifies mechanisms enabling shifts between integration modes • Moves sustainability transitions beyond participatory/not-participatory framings

Research PolicyVol. 55(4)
University of Oslo (NO), Utrecht University (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.