Intraday and Interday Reliability of Horizontal Upper Body Push and Pull Isometric Strength Qualities Using the VALD DynaMo Max Dynamometer

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the intraday and interday reliability of seated horizontal upper body (UB) isometric push and pull tests performed with the VALD DynaMo Max dynamometer. Methods: Fifty-two recreationally active individuals (41 men, 11 women; 25.0 ± 6.1 years) completed two sessions 48 h apart, each comprising three maximal-effort push and pull trials at 90° elbow flexion using a custom-built rig with the attached dynamometer. Peak force (PF), peak rate of force development (RFD), impulse, and time-to-PF were extracted from 1200 Hz force–time data. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV%), standard error of measure (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results: PF demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.97–0.99) with low absolute error (CV < 6%; MDC = 128–149 N). Impulse showed good-to-excellent reliability (ICC = 0.90–0.94; CV < 10%; MDC ≈ 755–790 N·s), whereas RFD displayed good reliability but greater variability (ICC = 0.80–0.81; CV < 20%; MDC = 2574–2925 N·s−1). Time-to-PF was the least reliable (ICC = 0.68–0.71; CV > 24%; MDC = 1.5–1.7 s). Conclusions: Horizontal isometric push and pull tests using the VALD DynaMo Max dynamometer provide reliable measures of PF and impulse for athlete profiling and tracking substantial longitudinal changes. Peak RFD may be cautiously used for broad cross-sectional comparisons, although its higher variability limits precision in distinguishing smaller inter-individual differences and appears less sensitive to within-individual changes. Time-to-PF demonstrated insufficient reliability for practical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomechanics
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics6010026
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraday and Interday Reliability of Horizontal Upper Body Push and Pull Isometric Strength Qualities Using the VALD DynaMo Max Dynamometer

Jill Alexander, Damian Harper, Lazar Toskić, Milan Marković et al.
Biomechanics
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Intraday and Interday Reliability of Horizontal Upper Body Push and Pull Isometric Strength Qualities Using the VALD DynaMo Max Dynamometer

Jill Alexander, Damian Harper, Lazar Toskić, Milan Marković, Ivan Čurović
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the intraday and interday reliability of seated horizontal upper body (UB) isometric push and pull tests performed with the VALD DynaMo Max dynamometer. Methods: Fifty-two recreationally active individuals (41 men, 11 women; 25.0 ± 6.1 years) completed two sessions 48 h apart, each comprising three maximal-effort push and pull trials at 90° elbow flexion using a custom-built rig with the attached dynamometer. Peak force (PF), peak rate of force development (RFD), impulse, and time-to-PF were extracted from 1200 Hz force–time data. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV%), standard error of measure (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results: PF demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.97–0.99) with low absolute error (CV < 6%; MDC = 128–149 N). Impulse showed good-to-excellent reliability (ICC = 0.90–0.94; CV < 10%; MDC ≈ 755–790 N·s), whereas RFD displayed good reliability but greater variability (ICC = 0.80–0.81; CV < 20%; MDC = 2574–2925 N·s−1). Time-to-PF was the least reliable (ICC = 0.68–0.71; CV > 24%; MDC = 1.5–1.7 s). Conclusions: Horizontal isometric push and pull tests using the VALD DynaMo Max dynamometer provide reliable measures of PF and impulse for athlete profiling and tracking substantial longitudinal changes. Peak RFD may be cautiously used for broad cross-sectional comparisons, although its higher variability limits precision in distinguishing smaller inter-individual differences and appears less sensitive to within-individual changes. Time-to-PF demonstrated insufficient reliability for practical application.

BiomechanicsVol. 6(1)
University of Lancashire (GB), Univerzitet Union Nikola Tesla (RS)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.