Minimum Hellinger distance estimators for complex survey designs

Abstract Reliable inference from complex survey samples can be derailed by outliers and high-leverage observations induced by unequal inclusion probabilities and calibration. We develop a minimum Hellinger distance estimator (MHDE) for parametric superpopulation models under complex designs, including Poisson PPS and fixed-size SRS/PPS without replacement, with possibly stochastic post-stratified or calibrated weights. Using a Horvitz–Thompson-adjusted kernel density plug-in, we show: (i) $$L^1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:math> -consistency of the KDE with explicit large-deviation tail bounds driven by a variance-adaptive effective sample size; (ii) uniform exponential bounds for the Hellinger affinity that yield MHDE consistency under mild identifiability; (iii) an asymptotic Normal distribution for the MHDE with covariance $$\textbf{A}^{-1}\varvec{\Sigma }\textbf{A}^{-\intercal }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mo>⊺</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (and a finite-population correction under without-replacement designs); and (iv) robustness via the influence function and $$\alpha $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:math> -influence curves in the Hellinger topology. Simulations under Gamma and lognormal superpopulation models quantify efficiency–robustness trade-offs relative to weighted MLE under independent and high-leverage contamination. An application to NHANES 2021–2023 total water consumption shows that the MHDE remains stable despite extreme responses that markedly bias the MLE. The estimator is simple to implement via quadrature over a fixed grid and is extensible to other divergence families.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arabian Journal of Mathematics
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40065-026-00618-3
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimum Hellinger distance estimators for complex survey designs

David Kepplinger, Anand N. Vidyashankar
Arabian Journal of Mathematics
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Minimum Hellinger distance estimators for complex survey designs

David Kepplinger, Anand N. Vidyashankar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Reliable inference from complex survey samples can be derailed by outliers and high-leverage observations induced by unequal inclusion probabilities and calibration. We develop a minimum Hellinger distance estimator (MHDE) for parametric superpopulation models under complex designs, including Poisson PPS and fixed-size SRS/PPS without replacement, with possibly stochastic post-stratified or calibrated weights. Using a Horvitz–Thompson-adjusted kernel density plug-in, we show: (i) $$L^1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:math> -consistency of the KDE with explicit large-deviation tail bounds driven by a variance-adaptive effective sample size; (ii) uniform exponential bounds for the Hellinger affinity that yield MHDE consistency under mild identifiability; (iii) an asymptotic Normal distribution for the MHDE with covariance $$\textbf{A}^{-1}\varvec{\Sigma }\textbf{A}^{-\intercal }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>A</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mo>⊺</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (and a finite-population correction under without-replacement designs); and (iv) robustness via the influence function and $$\alpha $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:math> -influence curves in the Hellinger topology. Simulations under Gamma and lognormal superpopulation models quantify efficiency–robustness trade-offs relative to weighted MLE under independent and high-leverage contamination. An application to NHANES 2021–2023 total water consumption shows that the MHDE remains stable despite extreme responses that markedly bias the MLE. The estimator is simple to implement via quadrature over a fixed grid and is extensible to other divergence families.

Arabian Journal of Mathematics
George Mason University (US)
National Science Foundation, George Mason University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.