Modeling the cross-sectional shape of the human crystalline lens using age-related parameters instead of the conic constant
Traditional conic-based models rely on conic constants, which exhibit high interindividual variability and limited age correlation, hindering population-level modeling. This study introduces a modified Poisson–Gauss (moPG) model, an enhancement of the Poisson–Gauss (PG) framework, to describe the human crystalline lens cross-sectional shape using solely age-related geometric parameters. The moPG extends the Poisson parameter m to real values via the Gamma function for continuous accommodation simulation and incorporates an equatorial curvature parameter k , inspired by Köller’s egg equation, for independent equatorial control. Analyzing pupil-limited conditions in OCT and MRI datasets, a non-zero k was suggested for biological plausibility. Evaluations on in vitro lens profiles ( n =10) showed better fitting than the PG model, with reduced dependence on the lens shape factor. moPG-derived surface areas, estimated from eigenlenses -model-derived geometric parameters, correlated strongly (Pearson correlation r =0.999, p <0.001) with eigenlenses surface area estimates from 83 in vivo measurements. Age-dependent simulations using two regression datasets yielded similar anterior–posterior thickness ratios but differing conic constants, further supporting the geometric consistency of the moPG formulation. Moreover, age-related equatorial changes arise from complementary effects: decreasing k >0 drives equatorial radius increase, while increasing m promotes progressive equatorial rounding.
Authors
- Do Phu
- Dang Le
Institutions
- Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
- Ho Chi Minh City University of Science (VN)
- Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (VN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Published
- 2026-03-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.588577
- Primary Topic
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00