Development and validation of a prognostic model for cirrhotic patients after endoscopic variceal ligation

To develop and validate a machine learning model incorporating liver function, variceal characteristics, and hemodynamic parameters for individualized prediction of prognosis in cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), thereby providing a reference for clinical outcome assessment and treatment decision-making. Cirrhotic patients who underwent EVL between January 2022 and December 2024 were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, univariate analysis, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify independent predictors. Key predictive variables were used to construct machine learning models (random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbors (KNN)). Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis, with the optimal model selected. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed to assess model interpretability, analyzing the direction and magnitude of variable contributions to predictions. A total of 342 patients were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a training set (n = 239) and a validation set (n = 103). Baseline clinical characteristics showed no significant differences between the training and validation sets (all P > 0.05). In the training set, multivariate logistic regression showed that Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, total bilirubin, maximum variceal diameter, and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis (all P < 0.05), whereas serum albumin, platelet count, and hemoglobin at admission were protective factors (all P < 0.05). Among machine learning models, the SVM model demonstrated superior predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.859 in the training set and 0.797 in the validation set, outperforming RF and KNN models. SHAP interpretability analysis confirmed that MELD score, HVPG, and total bilirubin contributed most strongly to increased risk, while serum albumin, platelet count, and hemoglobin at admission exerted protective effects. This study successfully developed and validated a predictive model incorporating MELD score, variceal diameter, and HVPG. The model accurately predicts survival in cirrhotic patients after EVL, serving as a practical tool for individualized prognostic assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-04697-6
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a prognostic model for cirrhotic patients after endoscopic variceal ligation

Jianmei Pan, Dongxue Yao
BMC Gastroenterology
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

Development and validation of a prognostic model for cirrhotic patients after endoscopic variceal ligation

Jianmei Pan, Dongxue Yao
article en

Abstract

To develop and validate a machine learning model incorporating liver function, variceal characteristics, and hemodynamic parameters for individualized prediction of prognosis in cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), thereby providing a reference for clinical outcome assessment and treatment decision-making. Cirrhotic patients who underwent EVL between January 2022 and December 2024 were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, univariate analysis, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify independent predictors. Key predictive variables were used to construct machine learning models (random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbors (KNN)). Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis, with the optimal model selected. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed to assess model interpretability, analyzing the direction and magnitude of variable contributions to predictions. A total of 342 patients were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a training set (n = 239) and a validation set (n = 103). Baseline clinical characteristics showed no significant differences between the training and validation sets (all P > 0.05). In the training set, multivariate logistic regression showed that Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, total bilirubin, maximum variceal diameter, and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis (all P < 0.05), whereas serum albumin, platelet count, and hemoglobin at admission were protective factors (all P < 0.05). Among machine learning models, the SVM model demonstrated superior predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.859 in the training set and 0.797 in the validation set, outperforming RF and KNN models. SHAP interpretability analysis confirmed that MELD score, HVPG, and total bilirubin contributed most strongly to increased risk, while serum albumin, platelet count, and hemoglobin at admission exerted protective effects. This study successfully developed and validated a predictive model incorporating MELD score, variceal diameter, and HVPG. The model accurately predicts survival in cirrhotic patients after EVL, serving as a practical tool for individualized prognostic assessment.

BMC Gastroenterology
Jinan Central Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.