The (Not So) Angry Black Woman: How Emotions Influence Political Participation of Black Women

Abstract The political participation of Black women has important consequences for electoral outcomes in the US, yet little is known about whether and how affect (both negative and positive) influences this group’s engagement in American politics. Despite the prevalent stereotype that Black women are “angry,” scholarly exploration of the effects of the emotions of these women is rare. In this paper, we highlight a gap in theories that center on Black women and argue that survey question wording about affect may impact how Black women express positive or negative emotions in relation to their political behavior. Using 2016 and 2020 CMPS data, we find support for our expectations. This project highlights the importance of group-specific, intersectional theories and the potential limitations to our understanding of how affect influences political participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2026.10060
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The (Not So) Angry Black Woman: How Emotions Influence Political Participation of Black Women

K. Wright, Jamil S. Scott-Cummings
The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics
Gender Politics and Representation
article

The (Not So) Angry Black Woman: How Emotions Influence Political Participation of Black Women

K. Wright, Jamil S. Scott-Cummings
article en

Abstract

Abstract The political participation of Black women has important consequences for electoral outcomes in the US, yet little is known about whether and how affect (both negative and positive) influences this group’s engagement in American politics. Despite the prevalent stereotype that Black women are “angry,” scholarly exploration of the effects of the emotions of these women is rare. In this paper, we highlight a gap in theories that center on Black women and argue that survey question wording about affect may impact how Black women express positive or negative emotions in relation to their political behavior. Using 2016 and 2020 CMPS data, we find support for our expectations. This project highlights the importance of group-specific, intersectional theories and the potential limitations to our understanding of how affect influences political participation.

The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics
Georgetown University (US), Arizona State University (US)
University of Cambridge
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Gender Politics and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The (Not So) Angry Black Woman: How Emotions Influence Political Participation of Black Women — K. Wright, Jamil S. Scott-Cummings · The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS