Internal strife or united strength breaks gold: Sibling co-management and corporate green innovation

Based on data from Chinese A-share listed family firms from 2009 to 2023, this paper examines the impact of sibling co-management on the green innovation. The findings indicated that sibling co-management negatively inhibited the level of green innovation, thereby lending support to the internal strife hypothesis. Mechanism analysis demonstrated that sibling co-management leaded to elevated agency costs and diminished risk-taking propensity, which in turn inhibited the green innovation of enterprises. Further analysis revealed that the inhibitory effect of sibling co-governance on green innovation was more significant in areas with strong Confucian cultural influence, low public attention to the environment, high degree of management conflict, poor family imprint, elder brother authority, and higher family shareholding ratio. This research not only contributes to the literature on sibling co-management but also offers valuable insights into the determinants of green innovation in family firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics & Finance
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2026.105075
Primary Topic
Firm Innovation and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Internal strife or united strength breaks gold: Sibling co-management and corporate green innovation

Qinhao Sun, Chun Su
International Review of Economics & Finance
Firm Innovation and Growth
article

Internal strife or united strength breaks gold: Sibling co-management and corporate green innovation

Qinhao Sun, Chun Su
article en

Abstract

Based on data from Chinese A-share listed family firms from 2009 to 2023, this paper examines the impact of sibling co-management on the green innovation. The findings indicated that sibling co-management negatively inhibited the level of green innovation, thereby lending support to the internal strife hypothesis. Mechanism analysis demonstrated that sibling co-management leaded to elevated agency costs and diminished risk-taking propensity, which in turn inhibited the green innovation of enterprises. Further analysis revealed that the inhibitory effect of sibling co-governance on green innovation was more significant in areas with strong Confucian cultural influence, low public attention to the environment, high degree of management conflict, poor family imprint, elder brother authority, and higher family shareholding ratio. This research not only contributes to the literature on sibling co-management but also offers valuable insights into the determinants of green innovation in family firms.

International Review of Economics & FinanceVol. 107
Chongqing University of Technology (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Firm Innovation and Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Internal strife or united strength breaks gold: Sibling co-management and corporate green innovation — Qinhao Sun, Chun Su · International Review of Economics & Finance (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS