Second Competition on Presentation Attack Detection on ID Card

This work summarises and reports the results of the second Presentation Attack Detection competition on ID cards. This new version includes new elements compared to the previous one. (1) An automatic evaluation platform was enabled for automatic benchmarking; (2) Two tracks were proposed in order to evaluate algorithms and datasets respectively; and (3) A new ID card dataset was shared with Track 1 teams to serve as the baseline dataset for the training and optimisation. The Hochschule Darmstadt, Fraunhofer-IGD, and Facephi company jointly organised this challenge. 20 teams were registered, and 74 submitted models were evaluated. For Track 1, the "Dragons" team reached first place with an Average Ranking and Equal Error rate (EER) of (AVRank) of 40.48% and 11.44% EER, respectively. For the more challenging approach in Track 2, the "Incode" team reached the best results with an AVRank of 14.76% and 6.36% EER, improving on the results of the first edition of 74.30% and 21.87% EER, respectively. These results suggest that PAD on ID cards is improving, but it is still a challenging problem related to the number of images, especially of bona fide images.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ijcb65343.2025.11411073
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Second Competition on Presentation Attack Detection on ID Card

Juan Tapia, Peter M. Peer, Borut Batagelj, Rodrigo Lara et al.
Spam and Phishing Detection
article

Second Competition on Presentation Attack Detection on ID Card

Juan Tapia, Peter M. Peer, Borut Batagelj, Rodrigo Lara, Javier Barrachina, Nuno Gonçalves, Patrick Schuch, Raghavendra Ramachandra, Ketan Kotwal, Andrés Valenzuela, Marija Ivanovska, Naser Damer, Raghavendra Mudgalgundurao, Kiran Raja, Pedro Couto Pereira, Sebastian Gonzalez, Ajnas Muhammed, Diogo Nunes, Sushrut Patwardhan, Alvaro S. Rocamora, Leon Todorov, Renat Khizbullin, Lazar Lazarevich, Marko Peterlin, C. Busch, Aleksei Grishin, Amir Mohammadi, Sébastien Marcel, Joao Ribeiro Pinto, Mariana Xavier, Mario Nieto, Daniel Schulz, Juan M. Espin
article en

Abstract

This work summarises and reports the results of the second Presentation Attack Detection competition on ID cards. This new version includes new elements compared to the previous one. (1) An automatic evaluation platform was enabled for automatic benchmarking; (2) Two tracks were proposed in order to evaluate algorithms and datasets respectively; and (3) A new ID card dataset was shared with Track 1 teams to serve as the baseline dataset for the training and optimisation. The Hochschule Darmstadt, Fraunhofer-IGD, and Facephi company jointly organised this challenge. 20 teams were registered, and 74 submitted models were evaluated. For Track 1, the "Dragons" team reached first place with an Average Ranking and Equal Error rate (EER) of (AVRank) of 40.48% and 11.44% EER, respectively. For the more challenging approach in Track 2, the "Incode" team reached the best results with an AVRank of 14.76% and 6.36% EER, improving on the results of the first edition of 74.30% and 21.87% EER, respectively. These results suggest that PAD on ID cards is improving, but it is still a challenging problem related to the number of images, especially of bona fide images.

Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL), Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences (DE), Autodesk (United States) (US), Universidad Andrés Bello (CL), University of Ljubljana (SI), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research (DE), Robotics Research (United States) (US), Amadeus (Spain) (ES), Idiap Research Institute (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.