On the Concept of Chinese Data Property Law – A Third Way?

Abstract Data have become the most important resource in the digital economy, and a legal framework may be needed to promote data sharing and exploit the value of data on the market, especially in the context of the development of the Internet of Things and AI. However, the right way to achieve this is subject to different approaches in legislation and data governance concepts centring around ownership in data. After extensive discussions, the EU chose not to establish exclusive rights for data but instead created a user-centred data access right against data holders. In contrast, China, as a civil law country, adopted a concept from common law systems, borrowing the ‘bundle of rights’ concept from property rights to establish a new form of data property rights. This paper examines in detail China’s emerging data property rights regime and analyses the concept in dogmatic terms. A comparison will also be made with the EU’s data access approach. While both systems face the same problems of solving conflicting interests, the two data rights systems differ significantly in terms of legal instruments to effectuate data sharing. This paper argues that the EU’s data access rights might offer valuable insights into China’s developing framework. At the same time, the Chinese approach may provide inspiration should the EU re-examine its own approach and revisit its intellectual property legislation concerning raw and derived data in the future.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
GRUR International
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikag015
Primary Topic
Big Data and Digital Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Concept of Chinese Data Property Law – A Third Way?

Xu Wang, Andreas Wiebe
GRUR International
Big Data and Digital Economy
article

On the Concept of Chinese Data Property Law – A Third Way?

Xu Wang, Andreas Wiebe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Data have become the most important resource in the digital economy, and a legal framework may be needed to promote data sharing and exploit the value of data on the market, especially in the context of the development of the Internet of Things and AI. However, the right way to achieve this is subject to different approaches in legislation and data governance concepts centring around ownership in data. After extensive discussions, the EU chose not to establish exclusive rights for data but instead created a user-centred data access right against data holders. In contrast, China, as a civil law country, adopted a concept from common law systems, borrowing the ‘bundle of rights’ concept from property rights to establish a new form of data property rights. This paper examines in detail China’s emerging data property rights regime and analyses the concept in dogmatic terms. A comparison will also be made with the EU’s data access approach. While both systems face the same problems of solving conflicting interests, the two data rights systems differ significantly in terms of legal instruments to effectuate data sharing. This paper argues that the EU’s data access rights might offer valuable insights into China’s developing framework. At the same time, the Chinese approach may provide inspiration should the EU re-examine its own approach and revisit its intellectual property legislation concerning raw and derived data in the future.

GRUR International
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Big Data and Digital Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the Concept of Chinese Data Property Law – A Third Way? — Xu Wang, Andreas Wiebe · GRUR International (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS