Detecting water in agricultural landscapes from remote sensing imagery: Methodological choices, sensor constraints and performance metrics

Monitoring surface water in agricultural landscapes is a key requirement for irrigation management, leak detection, and sustainable water use. Although remote sensing literature extensively addresses water detection, most studies focus on large-scale Surface Water Mapping (SWM) in heterogeneous landscapes, where extensive water bodies such as lakes, rivers, or coastal zones occupy a substantial portion of the scene. In contrast, fine-scale water detection in agricultural environments typically involves small, fragmented, and highly imbalanced targets embedded within predominantly vegetated or cultivated areas. As a result, methods and performance metrics developed for large-scale mapping cannot be directly transferred to fine-scale agricultural scenarios without adaptation. This paper analyses 49 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025 that address water detection in agricultural and rural contexts using multispectral, thermal, and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery from satellite and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) platforms. Rather than providing a purely descriptive review, the work examines how methodological choices — ranging from spectral indices and decision trees to machine learning, deep learning, and foundation models — interact with sensor characteristics, processing levels, and evaluation metrics. The analysis highlights systematic trade-offs among model complexity, data availability, and robustness, identifies recurrent limitations in multiple accuracy metrics in scenarios where land pixels vastly outnumber water pixels, and synthesizes the practical implications of spectral band selection (VNIR, SWIR, TIR) and platform resolution. A central contribution of this review is the demonstration that, in agricultural water detection, preprocessing choices, sensor characteristics, and the use of appropriate evaluation metrics often have a greater influence on reported performance than the complexity of the detection algorithm itself. Based on these findings, the paper offers comparative insights and methodological recommendations to guide the selection and validation of water-detection approaches in agricultural remote sensing applications. • Review (2020–2025) of fine-scale water detection using remote sensing imagery. • Comparative synthesis of spectral, machine and deep learning models under real-world constraints. • F1-Score and IoU outperform Overall Accuracy for robust evaluation under class im- balance. • Analysis of preprocessing, sharpening, augmentation, and multi-sensor fusion impacts. • Identifies gaps in spatial refinement and hybrid segmentation–decision frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110264
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting water in agricultural landscapes from remote sensing imagery: Methodological choices, sensor constraints and performance metrics

J.M. Manzano, C. Ierardi, D.A. Merchán
Agricultural Water Management
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Detecting water in agricultural landscapes from remote sensing imagery: Methodological choices, sensor constraints and performance metrics

J.M. Manzano, C. Ierardi, D.A. Merchán
article en

Abstract

Monitoring surface water in agricultural landscapes is a key requirement for irrigation management, leak detection, and sustainable water use. Although remote sensing literature extensively addresses water detection, most studies focus on large-scale Surface Water Mapping (SWM) in heterogeneous landscapes, where extensive water bodies such as lakes, rivers, or coastal zones occupy a substantial portion of the scene. In contrast, fine-scale water detection in agricultural environments typically involves small, fragmented, and highly imbalanced targets embedded within predominantly vegetated or cultivated areas. As a result, methods and performance metrics developed for large-scale mapping cannot be directly transferred to fine-scale agricultural scenarios without adaptation. This paper analyses 49 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025 that address water detection in agricultural and rural contexts using multispectral, thermal, and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery from satellite and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) platforms. Rather than providing a purely descriptive review, the work examines how methodological choices — ranging from spectral indices and decision trees to machine learning, deep learning, and foundation models — interact with sensor characteristics, processing levels, and evaluation metrics. The analysis highlights systematic trade-offs among model complexity, data availability, and robustness, identifies recurrent limitations in multiple accuracy metrics in scenarios where land pixels vastly outnumber water pixels, and synthesizes the practical implications of spectral band selection (VNIR, SWIR, TIR) and platform resolution. A central contribution of this review is the demonstration that, in agricultural water detection, preprocessing choices, sensor characteristics, and the use of appropriate evaluation metrics often have a greater influence on reported performance than the complexity of the detection algorithm itself. Based on these findings, the paper offers comparative insights and methodological recommendations to guide the selection and validation of water-detection approaches in agricultural remote sensing applications. • Review (2020–2025) of fine-scale water detection using remote sensing imagery. • Comparative synthesis of spectral, machine and deep learning models under real-world constraints. • F1-Score and IoU outperform Overall Accuracy for robust evaluation under class im- balance. • Analysis of preprocessing, sharpening, augmentation, and multi-sensor fusion impacts. • Identifies gaps in spatial refinement and hybrid segmentation–decision frameworks.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 327
Universidad Loyola Andalucía (ES)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.