Comparison of Hemodynamics After Fenestrated, Branched, and Chimney Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Employing Computational Fluid Dynamics

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study compared the hemodynamic performance of fenestrated (FEVAR), branched (BEVAR), and chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (chEVAR) in patients with complex aortic aneurysms. <b>Methods:</b> The pre- (native) and post-endovascular repair (endograft-defined) blood lumen was reconstructed from computed tomography angiographies of nine (9) elective patients treated with FEVAR (<i>n</i> = 3), BEVAR (<i>n</i> = 3), and chEVAR (<i>n</i> = 3). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations obtained blood flow properties. Velocity magnitude, wall shear stress (WSS), time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), and local normalized helicity (LNH) were computed at peak systole and mid-diastole. The hemodynamic data were statistically analyzed to evaluate correlations between FEVAR, BEVAR, and chEVAR, focusing on targeted visceral arteries. <b>Results:</b> Only slight differences were observed regarding RRT, OSI, and TAWSS between FEVAR and BEVAR, whereas the chEVAR group demonstrated a marked deviation from both. In FEVAR, the postoperative helical flow structures appeared more compact, while in BEVAR they were more developed and exhibited a more rotational configuration. The LNH of the visceral vessel patterns exhibited similar qualitative features across groups. Regarding TAWSS, higher values were found in BEVAR, whereas chEVAR showed the lowest. <b>Conclusions:</b> FEVAR, BEVAR, and chEVAR improved postoperative blood flow characteristics toward near-physiological conditions, reducing undesired flow patterns and recirculation zones. FEVAR showed more stable visceral flow, and BEVAR demonstrated higher flow rates and fewer recirculation zones, while chEVAR exhibited more streamlined visceral artery flow with reduced regurgitation at bridging stent entries. Despite variations, all approaches effectively preserved visceral artery perfusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051914
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Hemodynamics After Fenestrated, Branched, and Chimney Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Employing Computational Fluid Dynamics

Laura Fazzini, M. Matsagkas, Stavros Malatos, Michalis Xenos et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
article

Comparison of Hemodynamics After Fenestrated, Branched, and Chimney Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Employing Computational Fluid Dynamics

Laura Fazzini, M. Matsagkas, Stavros Malatos, Michalis Xenos, Spyridon Katsoudas, Petroula Nana, Anastasios Raptis, Athanasios Giannoukas, George Kouvelos
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study compared the hemodynamic performance of fenestrated (FEVAR), branched (BEVAR), and chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (chEVAR) in patients with complex aortic aneurysms. <b>Methods:</b> The pre- (native) and post-endovascular repair (endograft-defined) blood lumen was reconstructed from computed tomography angiographies of nine (9) elective patients treated with FEVAR (<i>n</i> = 3), BEVAR (<i>n</i> = 3), and chEVAR (<i>n</i> = 3). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations obtained blood flow properties. Velocity magnitude, wall shear stress (WSS), time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), and local normalized helicity (LNH) were computed at peak systole and mid-diastole. The hemodynamic data were statistically analyzed to evaluate correlations between FEVAR, BEVAR, and chEVAR, focusing on targeted visceral arteries. <b>Results:</b> Only slight differences were observed regarding RRT, OSI, and TAWSS between FEVAR and BEVAR, whereas the chEVAR group demonstrated a marked deviation from both. In FEVAR, the postoperative helical flow structures appeared more compact, while in BEVAR they were more developed and exhibited a more rotational configuration. The LNH of the visceral vessel patterns exhibited similar qualitative features across groups. Regarding TAWSS, higher values were found in BEVAR, whereas chEVAR showed the lowest. <b>Conclusions:</b> FEVAR, BEVAR, and chEVAR improved postoperative blood flow characteristics toward near-physiological conditions, reducing undesired flow patterns and recirculation zones. FEVAR showed more stable visceral flow, and BEVAR demonstrated higher flow rates and fewer recirculation zones, while chEVAR exhibited more streamlined visceral artery flow with reduced regurgitation at bridging stent entries. Despite variations, all approaches effectively preserved visceral artery perfusion.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(5)
University of Thessaly (GR), Universität Hamburg (DE), National Technical University of Athens (GR), University of Ioannina (GR), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.