From Silent Threat to Early Intervention: Evaluating the Universal Hearing Screening Program in Infants at a Primary Health Facility in Zambia—A Prospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Successful implementation of universal hearing screening has been shown to be an effective strategy for minimizing the negative impact of hearing loss in childhood. However, data on prevalence and risk of hearing loss among neonates and infants in Zambia remain underreported, thus negatively affecting government obligations to provide equitable resources and focus to hearing health care programs. The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility of implementing a universal hearing screening program using otoacoustic emissions and contextualize risk factors appropriate for a successful hearing screening program in Zambia. Method: This planned substudy of a prospective birth cohort employed a quantitative, longitudinal repeated-measures design. Data on risk factors for hearing loss were collected using a semistructured questionnaire. Other data variables for risk factors of hearing loss such as maternal COVID-19, HIV status, cytomegalovirus, and syphilis were collected from the parent study. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) screenings were conducted at two time points, 6 days after birth and at 6 months after birth. Participants who did not pass the second DPOAE hearing screening were referred for further diagnostic audiological assessment. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. We also performed chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results: Over the course of 6 months, a total of 678 of 726 (93%) infants born into the cohort were screened for hearing loss. Of the nine infants referred for further diagnostic testing, three were lost to follow-up and six underwent either tympanometry or auditory brain response testing. Most tympanometry findings were type B, which is associated with abnormal otoscopic findings. From these six, one was diagnosed with mild-to-moderate hearing loss using the auditory steady-state response test. Thus, the incidence of hearing loss was 1.5 per 1,000 live births. There was no association between low birth weight, prematurity, neonatal jaundice, and corresponding DPOAEs results. Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of prioritizing universal hearing screening services at primary health facilities. Implementing these services at primary health facilities will substantially mitigate the negative consequences associated with delayed diagnosis of hearing loss. Nonetheless, further evaluation is needed to assess practical considerations such as cost-effectiveness and operational scalability in the Zambian context. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.31362598

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_persp-25-00107
Primary Topic
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Silent Threat to Early Intervention: Evaluating the Universal Hearing Screening Program in Infants at a Primary Health Facility in Zambia—A Prospective Cohort Study

Lawrence Mwananyanda, Ethan Zulu, Cassandra R. Duffy, Christopher Gill et al.
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
article

From Silent Threat to Early Intervention: Evaluating the Universal Hearing Screening Program in Infants at a Primary Health Facility in Zambia—A Prospective Cohort Study

Lawrence Mwananyanda, Ethan Zulu, Cassandra R. Duffy, Christopher Gill, Barbara Payne-Lohman, Megan Harper, Leah Forman, Roma Chilengi, Tim Heeren, Janik Shah, Julie M. Herlihy, Donald M. Thea
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Successful implementation of universal hearing screening has been shown to be an effective strategy for minimizing the negative impact of hearing loss in childhood. However, data on prevalence and risk of hearing loss among neonates and infants in Zambia remain underreported, thus negatively affecting government obligations to provide equitable resources and focus to hearing health care programs. The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility of implementing a universal hearing screening program using otoacoustic emissions and contextualize risk factors appropriate for a successful hearing screening program in Zambia. Method: This planned substudy of a prospective birth cohort employed a quantitative, longitudinal repeated-measures design. Data on risk factors for hearing loss were collected using a semistructured questionnaire. Other data variables for risk factors of hearing loss such as maternal COVID-19, HIV status, cytomegalovirus, and syphilis were collected from the parent study. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) screenings were conducted at two time points, 6 days after birth and at 6 months after birth. Participants who did not pass the second DPOAE hearing screening were referred for further diagnostic audiological assessment. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. We also performed chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results: Over the course of 6 months, a total of 678 of 726 (93%) infants born into the cohort were screened for hearing loss. Of the nine infants referred for further diagnostic testing, three were lost to follow-up and six underwent either tympanometry or auditory brain response testing. Most tympanometry findings were type B, which is associated with abnormal otoscopic findings. From these six, one was diagnosed with mild-to-moderate hearing loss using the auditory steady-state response test. Thus, the incidence of hearing loss was 1.5 per 1,000 live births. There was no association between low birth weight, prematurity, neonatal jaundice, and corresponding DPOAEs results. Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of prioritizing universal hearing screening services at primary health facilities. Implementing these services at primary health facilities will substantially mitigate the negative consequences associated with delayed diagnosis of hearing loss. Nonetheless, further evaluation is needed to assess practical considerations such as cost-effectiveness and operational scalability in the Zambian context. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.31362598

Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Boston University (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (ZM), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), University of Rhode Island (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Right to Care (ZM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.