The Principle of Inherent Human Dignity in International Human Rights Law: Philosophical Foundations, Legal Codification, and the Challenge of Cultural Relativism

The notion of human dignity serves as the foundational principle of modern international human rights law and acts as the normative cornerstone of global bioethics. This chapter explores the philosophical progression of human dignity, tracing its origins from ancient Greek and Stoic thought through Christian theology to Enlightenment philosophy, thereby illustrating how the concept has been articulated throughout various intellectual traditions. The analysis examines how dignity, defined as the inherent and inalienable worth that is equally possessed by all members of the human family, emerged as the organizing principle of the international legal order established post-World War II, first enshrined in the United Nations Charter (1945) and later in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). It is established in this chapter that human dignity serves as the ultimate source from which fundamental human rights are derived, rather than being classified as a right itself. This foundational relationship elucidates that rights exist due to individuals' intrinsic worth, independent of state endorsement. The inherent and universal nature of dignity necessitates equal treatment and prohibits discrimination, thus providing the normative framework for safeguarding human integrity against potentially detrimental biotechnological advancements. In addressing the critique of cultural relativism, the chapter illustrates that while human dignity has been systematically developed within Western philosophy, analogous concepts are present in non-Western traditions, including Confucianism and Islam. International human rights instruments, notably the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005), acknowledge cultural diversity while asserting that cultural practices cannot override fundamental human rights principles. The chapter concludes by affirming that human dignity functions as a unifying transcultural principle, facilitating the establishment of minimal common bioethical standards while honouring legitimate cultural variations in their application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18842987
Primary Topic
Patient Dignity and Privacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Principle of Inherent Human Dignity in International Human Rights Law: Philosophical Foundations, Legal Codification, and the Challenge of Cultural Relativism

Shiv Shakti Singh Shekhawat, Rohan Rajeev Ghosh
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Patient Dignity and Privacy
article

The Principle of Inherent Human Dignity in International Human Rights Law: Philosophical Foundations, Legal Codification, and the Challenge of Cultural Relativism

Shiv Shakti Singh Shekhawat, Rohan Rajeev Ghosh
article en

Abstract

The notion of human dignity serves as the foundational principle of modern international human rights law and acts as the normative cornerstone of global bioethics. This chapter explores the philosophical progression of human dignity, tracing its origins from ancient Greek and Stoic thought through Christian theology to Enlightenment philosophy, thereby illustrating how the concept has been articulated throughout various intellectual traditions. The analysis examines how dignity, defined as the inherent and inalienable worth that is equally possessed by all members of the human family, emerged as the organizing principle of the international legal order established post-World War II, first enshrined in the United Nations Charter (1945) and later in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). It is established in this chapter that human dignity serves as the ultimate source from which fundamental human rights are derived, rather than being classified as a right itself. This foundational relationship elucidates that rights exist due to individuals' intrinsic worth, independent of state endorsement. The inherent and universal nature of dignity necessitates equal treatment and prohibits discrimination, thus providing the normative framework for safeguarding human integrity against potentially detrimental biotechnological advancements. In addressing the critique of cultural relativism, the chapter illustrates that while human dignity has been systematically developed within Western philosophy, analogous concepts are present in non-Western traditions, including Confucianism and Islam. International human rights instruments, notably the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005), acknowledge cultural diversity while asserting that cultural practices cannot override fundamental human rights principles. The chapter concludes by affirming that human dignity functions as a unifying transcultural principle, facilitating the establishment of minimal common bioethical standards while honouring legitimate cultural variations in their application.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
College of Law (LV)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Patient Dignity and Privacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Principle of Inherent Human Dignity in International Human Rights Law: Philosophical Foundations, Legal Codification, and the Challenge of Cultural Relativism — Shiv Shakti Singh Shekhawat, Rohan Rajeev Ghosh · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS