Does distance influence international collaboration among scientists? Evidence from library and information science

Abstract The study systematically investigates the determinants of international research collaboration in Library and Information Science (LIS) from 1990 to 2019. Using a gravity model estimated by Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) with high-dimensional fixed effects and fractional counting, we analyze the evolving patterns and drivers of collaboration. The findings reveal several key trends: collaborative research has become the dominant form of scholarly production, with the share of co-authored articles rising from 23.03% to 74.89%. International collaboration grew at a remarkable compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.67%, significantly outpacing domestic collaboration. The field continues to be characterized by small-to-medium sized teams, typically consisting of 2–6 authors. Network analysis shows substantial structural expansion: the number of participating countries doubled from 54 to 105, collaborative ties increased sixfold, and the total volume of decadal collaboration grew by 41.5 times. The international collaboration network has evolved from a hub-and-spoke model centered on the United States to a bipolar system led by China and the United States, supported by multiple regional poles. In terms of determining factors, traditional gravitational factors—shared language, land contiguity and colonial relationships—have shown a strong and lasting positive impact on collaboration. Its influence remains relatively stable within 30 years, especially in the second half. In contrast, neither economic nor political distance has shown a sustained impact. The robustness test confirmed the reliability of these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06767-2
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does distance influence international collaboration among scientists? Evidence from library and information science

Yuting Zhao
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Does distance influence international collaboration among scientists? Evidence from library and information science

Yuting Zhao
article en

Abstract

Abstract The study systematically investigates the determinants of international research collaboration in Library and Information Science (LIS) from 1990 to 2019. Using a gravity model estimated by Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) with high-dimensional fixed effects and fractional counting, we analyze the evolving patterns and drivers of collaboration. The findings reveal several key trends: collaborative research has become the dominant form of scholarly production, with the share of co-authored articles rising from 23.03% to 74.89%. International collaboration grew at a remarkable compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.67%, significantly outpacing domestic collaboration. The field continues to be characterized by small-to-medium sized teams, typically consisting of 2–6 authors. Network analysis shows substantial structural expansion: the number of participating countries doubled from 54 to 105, collaborative ties increased sixfold, and the total volume of decadal collaboration grew by 41.5 times. The international collaboration network has evolved from a hub-and-spoke model centered on the United States to a bipolar system led by China and the United States, supported by multiple regional poles. In terms of determining factors, traditional gravitational factors—shared language, land contiguity and colonial relationships—have shown a strong and lasting positive impact on collaboration. Its influence remains relatively stable within 30 years, especially in the second half. In contrast, neither economic nor political distance has shown a sustained impact. The robustness test confirmed the reliability of these findings.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Wuhan University (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does distance influence international collaboration among scientists? Evidence from library and information science — Yuting Zhao · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS