“Emotions as a Bridge To Understanding the Future of Images and Society”

Sociology today is developing a pluralistic, methodological, and epistemological approach to the world of images—artistic, photographic, videographic, or cinematographic. Here, we will use a content analysis perspective, which, although still not widely known or appreciated, has existed at least since the 1930s and has numerous highly prestigious proponents—A. Weber, K. Mannheim, N. Elias, P. Bourdieu, R. Sennett, and others. We will therefore attempt to interpret the meaning of images, starting from Weberian interpretive sociology and his relationship to social and visual hermeneutics and the method of iconological analysis. We will also draw on the concepts of “future” and “emotion,” their interrelationships, and the ways in which sociologists approach them. In this work, the future is understood as a cultural fact (Appadurai and Villegas, 2015) and a sociocultural construct, while emotions are considered to produce feelings, identifications, and memories in images, even more so than words. In fact, they stimulate imagination, introspection, and understanding, and thus announce/denounce a reality or imagine alternatives to it. Finally, we argue that sociologists, in analyzing images, are “creators of the future” (Bell & Wau, 1971), and consequently, so is Visual Sociology itself. We conclude that emotions constitute a bridge to understanding the future of images and society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Sociologist
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-026-09678-6
Primary Topic
Sociology and Norbert Elias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Emotions as a Bridge To Understanding the Future of Images and Society”

Melissa Julian
The American Sociologist
Sociology and Norbert Elias
article

“Emotions as a Bridge To Understanding the Future of Images and Society”

Melissa Julian
article en

Abstract

Sociology today is developing a pluralistic, methodological, and epistemological approach to the world of images—artistic, photographic, videographic, or cinematographic. Here, we will use a content analysis perspective, which, although still not widely known or appreciated, has existed at least since the 1930s and has numerous highly prestigious proponents—A. Weber, K. Mannheim, N. Elias, P. Bourdieu, R. Sennett, and others. We will therefore attempt to interpret the meaning of images, starting from Weberian interpretive sociology and his relationship to social and visual hermeneutics and the method of iconological analysis. We will also draw on the concepts of “future” and “emotion,” their interrelationships, and the ways in which sociologists approach them. In this work, the future is understood as a cultural fact (Appadurai and Villegas, 2015) and a sociocultural construct, while emotions are considered to produce feelings, identifications, and memories in images, even more so than words. In fact, they stimulate imagination, introspection, and understanding, and thus announce/denounce a reality or imagine alternatives to it. Finally, we argue that sociologists, in analyzing images, are “creators of the future” (Bell & Wau, 1971), and consequently, so is Visual Sociology itself. We conclude that emotions constitute a bridge to understanding the future of images and society.

The American Sociologist
University of Alicante (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Sociology and Norbert Elias
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.