Revisiting the Slip Boundary Condition: Surface Roughness as a Hidden Tuning Parameter

Abstract In this paper, we investigate the effect of boundary surface roughness on numerical simulations of incompressible fluid flow past a cylinder in two and three spatial dimensions furnished with slip boundary conditions. The governing equations are approximated using a continuous finite element method, stabilized with a Galerkin least-squares approach. Through a series of numerical experiments, we demonstrate that: ( i ) the introduction of surface roughness through numerical discretization error, or mesh distortion, makes the potential flow solution unstable; ( ii ) when numerical surface roughness and mesh distortion are minimized by using high-order isoparametric geometry mappings, a stable potential flow is obtained in both two and three dimensions; ( iii ) numerical surface roughness, mesh distortion and refinement level can be used as control parameters to manipulate drag and lift forces resulting in numerical values spanning more than an order of magnitude. Our results cast some doubt on the predictive capability of the slip boundary condition for wall modeling in turbulent simulations of incompressible flow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-026-01009-6
Primary Topic
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Slip Boundary Condition: Surface Roughness as a Hidden Tuning Parameter

Murtazo Nazarov, Peter Munch, Matthias Maier
Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
article

Revisiting the Slip Boundary Condition: Surface Roughness as a Hidden Tuning Parameter

Murtazo Nazarov, Peter Munch, Matthias Maier
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we investigate the effect of boundary surface roughness on numerical simulations of incompressible fluid flow past a cylinder in two and three spatial dimensions furnished with slip boundary conditions. The governing equations are approximated using a continuous finite element method, stabilized with a Galerkin least-squares approach. Through a series of numerical experiments, we demonstrate that: ( i ) the introduction of surface roughness through numerical discretization error, or mesh distortion, makes the potential flow solution unstable; ( ii ) when numerical surface roughness and mesh distortion are minimized by using high-order isoparametric geometry mappings, a stable potential flow is obtained in both two and three dimensions; ( iii ) numerical surface roughness, mesh distortion and refinement level can be used as control parameters to manipulate drag and lift forces resulting in numerical values spanning more than an order of magnitude. Our results cast some doubt on the predictive capability of the slip boundary condition for wall modeling in turbulent simulations of incompressible flow.

Journal of Mathematical Fluid MechanicsVol. 28(2)
Uppsala University (SE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Texas A&M University (US)
National Science Foundation, Vetenskapsrådet, Uppsala Universitet, U.S. Air Force
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting the Slip Boundary Condition: Surface Roughness as a Hidden Tuning Parameter — Murtazo Nazarov, Peter Munch, et al. · Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS