AI in School EFL Learning: A Systematic Review of Impact Pathways for Engagement, Achievement, and Satisfaction

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into school-based English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction, yet the mechanisms through which it shapes learners’ engagement, achievement, and satisfaction remain insufficiently theorised. Although prior studies report positive effects, they rarely explain how AI influences learning processes within authentic classroom conditions. Purpose: This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence to explain how and under what conditions AI technologies shape engagement, achievement, and satisfaction in school EFL contexts. Specifically, it aims to identify the mediating cognitive, affective, and behavioural mechanisms through which AI operates, examine contextual moderators influencing its effectiveness, and develop an integrative AI Impact Pathways Framework to guide theory-driven research and context-sensitive pedagogical design. Method: A comprehensive search across seven databases yielded 99 records; following PRISMA 2020 procedures, 23 empirical studies involving direct AI use by K–12 EFL learners were retained. Thematic synthesis was employed to identify cross-study patterns and inductively develop a multi-pathway explanatory framework. Findings: AI tools—including NLP-based feedback systems, intelligent tutoring systems, conversational agents, gamified applications, and adaptive learning platforms—enhanced engagement by increasing interactivity, reducing anxiety, and sustaining time-on-task. Achievement gains were associated with personalised scaffolding, iterative feedback loops, and opportunities for authentic language use across speaking, reading, writing, and vocabulary learning. Satisfaction improved when AI supported autonomy, emotional reassurance, and perceptions of usefulness. Three interrelated pathways—cognitive, affective, and behavioural—mediated these outcomes, while teacher readiness, digital infrastructure, cultural–linguistic fit, student digital literacy, and cognitive load served as five significant contextual moderators. Implications: The review advances theoretical understanding by proposing the AI Impact Pathways Framework in School EFL Learning, which clarifies how AI affordances interact with pedagogical processes and contextual conditions to shape learner outcomes. The findings provide guidance for designing equitable, context-sensitive AI integration in schools and highlight the need for longitudinal, cross-cultural, and theory-driven research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of language and Education
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.22083
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI in School EFL Learning: A Systematic Review of Impact Pathways for Engagement, Achievement, and Satisfaction

Tripti Bej, Arnab Kundu
Journal of language and Education
AI in Service Interactions
article

AI in School EFL Learning: A Systematic Review of Impact Pathways for Engagement, Achievement, and Satisfaction

Tripti Bej, Arnab Kundu
article en

Abstract

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into school-based English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction, yet the mechanisms through which it shapes learners’ engagement, achievement, and satisfaction remain insufficiently theorised. Although prior studies report positive effects, they rarely explain how AI influences learning processes within authentic classroom conditions. Purpose: This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence to explain how and under what conditions AI technologies shape engagement, achievement, and satisfaction in school EFL contexts. Specifically, it aims to identify the mediating cognitive, affective, and behavioural mechanisms through which AI operates, examine contextual moderators influencing its effectiveness, and develop an integrative AI Impact Pathways Framework to guide theory-driven research and context-sensitive pedagogical design. Method: A comprehensive search across seven databases yielded 99 records; following PRISMA 2020 procedures, 23 empirical studies involving direct AI use by K–12 EFL learners were retained. Thematic synthesis was employed to identify cross-study patterns and inductively develop a multi-pathway explanatory framework. Findings: AI tools—including NLP-based feedback systems, intelligent tutoring systems, conversational agents, gamified applications, and adaptive learning platforms—enhanced engagement by increasing interactivity, reducing anxiety, and sustaining time-on-task. Achievement gains were associated with personalised scaffolding, iterative feedback loops, and opportunities for authentic language use across speaking, reading, writing, and vocabulary learning. Satisfaction improved when AI supported autonomy, emotional reassurance, and perceptions of usefulness. Three interrelated pathways—cognitive, affective, and behavioural—mediated these outcomes, while teacher readiness, digital infrastructure, cultural–linguistic fit, student digital literacy, and cognitive load served as five significant contextual moderators. Implications: The review advances theoretical understanding by proposing the AI Impact Pathways Framework in School EFL Learning, which clarifies how AI affordances interact with pedagogical processes and contextual conditions to shape learner outcomes. The findings provide guidance for designing equitable, context-sensitive AI integration in schools and highlight the need for longitudinal, cross-cultural, and theory-driven research.

Journal of language and EducationVol. 11(4)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.