A Formative Assessment of Traditional Undergraduate Students’ Use of an AI Learning Platform in STEM Courses

A small to midsized university supported science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education by partnering with a reputable online learning company to provide students and faculty access to artificial intelligence powered textbook problem sets and chatbots. An in-house formative assessment study was conducted in Fall 2024 and Spring 2025 to understand how traditional undergraduate students engaged with the platform. Quantitative results suggests that the general population did not utilize it as much as initially expected. Qualitative findings imply that students might have preferred alternative platforms like ChatGPT, though this may have had nothing to do with the company itself. Overall, students sought superficial answers and neglected the conceptual foundations of assignments. They may have been overwhelmed when utilizing these tools given the lack of guidance from instructors on how, if at all, to use them. The same might be true of instructors. One specific recommendation is to increase training opportunities for how to interface with specific AI tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61669/001c.158449
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Formative Assessment of Traditional Undergraduate Students’ Use of an AI Learning Platform in STEM Courses

Dane Christian Joseph, Rick Muthiah
Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

A Formative Assessment of Traditional Undergraduate Students’ Use of an AI Learning Platform in STEM Courses

Dane Christian Joseph, Rick Muthiah
article en

Abstract

A small to midsized university supported science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education by partnering with a reputable online learning company to provide students and faculty access to artificial intelligence powered textbook problem sets and chatbots. An in-house formative assessment study was conducted in Fall 2024 and Spring 2025 to understand how traditional undergraduate students engaged with the platform. Quantitative results suggests that the general population did not utilize it as much as initially expected. Qualitative findings imply that students might have preferred alternative platforms like ChatGPT, though this may have had nothing to do with the company itself. Overall, students sought superficial answers and neglected the conceptual foundations of assignments. They may have been overwhelmed when utilizing these tools given the lack of guidance from instructors on how, if at all, to use them. The same might be true of instructors. One specific recommendation is to increase training opportunities for how to interface with specific AI tools.

Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning
George Fox University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Formative Assessment of Traditional Undergraduate Students’ Use of an AI Learning Platform in STEM Courses — Dane Christian Joseph, Rick Muthiah · Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS