The Relationship Between Calcaneal Bump Height and Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Weight-Bearing Lateral Radiographs: Cross-Sectional Study in Adult Males

<b>Objectives:</b> To investigate the association between calcaneal bump height and hindfoot radiographic parameters on weight-bearing lateral radiographs in adult males with Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD), and to determine whether posterior calcaneal morphology differs between feet with and without PCFD-related flatfoot alignment. <b>Materials:</b> We retrospectively reviewed 583 men (1166 feet), aged 17-46 years, who underwent standing weight-bearing lateral foot radiographs between 1 January 2024 and 31 August 2025. Radiographic measurements included calcaneal pitch, Meary's angle, navicular height, tibiocalcaneal angle, Böhler's angle, Fowler-Philip angle, calcaneal bump height, and additional calcaneal morphological indices. A flatfoot alignment consistent with PCFD was defined as a calcaneal pitch < 18°. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to assess diagnostic performance and identify parameters independently associated with flatfoot alignment. <b>Results:</b> Flatfoot alignment was identified in 232 feet (19.9%) from 153 patients (26.2%). Compared with normally aligned feet, the flatfoot group demonstrated significantly lower navicular height, calcaneal bump height, and Böhler's angle, along with higher tibiocalcaneal and Meary's angles (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). ROC analysis showed navicular height to be the most accurate diagnostic parameter (AUC = 0.75), followed by the tibiocalcaneal angle (AUC = 0.69). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that navicular height ≤ 52.7 mm, tibiocalcaneal angle > 64.6°, Böhler's angle ≤ 32.9°, Meary's angle > 4.9°, calcaneal bump height ≤ 3.9 mm, and Fowler-Philip angle > 61.1° were independently associated with flatfoot alignment (Nagelkerke R<sup>2</sup> = 0.293, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Calcaneal bump height is reduced in PCFD and reflects posterior calcaneal remodelling associated with hindfoot malalignment and medial arch collapse. Although not a primary diagnostic parameter, calcaneal bump height provides complementary morphological information that may inform surgical planning and osteotomy strategy aimed at restoring physiologic hindfoot biomechanics and Achilles tendon loading in patients with PCFD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16050745
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship Between Calcaneal Bump Height and Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Weight-Bearing Lateral Radiographs: Cross-Sectional Study in Adult Males

Mahmut Tunçez, Hulya Cetin Tuncez, Zehra Hilal Adibelli, Selin Eroglu
Diagnostics
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

The Relationship Between Calcaneal Bump Height and Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity on Weight-Bearing Lateral Radiographs: Cross-Sectional Study in Adult Males

Mahmut Tunçez, Hulya Cetin Tuncez, Zehra Hilal Adibelli, Selin Eroglu
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> To investigate the association between calcaneal bump height and hindfoot radiographic parameters on weight-bearing lateral radiographs in adult males with Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD), and to determine whether posterior calcaneal morphology differs between feet with and without PCFD-related flatfoot alignment. <b>Materials:</b> We retrospectively reviewed 583 men (1166 feet), aged 17-46 years, who underwent standing weight-bearing lateral foot radiographs between 1 January 2024 and 31 August 2025. Radiographic measurements included calcaneal pitch, Meary's angle, navicular height, tibiocalcaneal angle, Böhler's angle, Fowler-Philip angle, calcaneal bump height, and additional calcaneal morphological indices. A flatfoot alignment consistent with PCFD was defined as a calcaneal pitch < 18°. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to assess diagnostic performance and identify parameters independently associated with flatfoot alignment. <b>Results:</b> Flatfoot alignment was identified in 232 feet (19.9%) from 153 patients (26.2%). Compared with normally aligned feet, the flatfoot group demonstrated significantly lower navicular height, calcaneal bump height, and Böhler's angle, along with higher tibiocalcaneal and Meary's angles (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). ROC analysis showed navicular height to be the most accurate diagnostic parameter (AUC = 0.75), followed by the tibiocalcaneal angle (AUC = 0.69). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that navicular height ≤ 52.7 mm, tibiocalcaneal angle > 64.6°, Böhler's angle ≤ 32.9°, Meary's angle > 4.9°, calcaneal bump height ≤ 3.9 mm, and Fowler-Philip angle > 61.1° were independently associated with flatfoot alignment (Nagelkerke R<sup>2</sup> = 0.293, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Calcaneal bump height is reduced in PCFD and reflects posterior calcaneal remodelling associated with hindfoot malalignment and medial arch collapse. Although not a primary diagnostic parameter, calcaneal bump height provides complementary morphological information that may inform surgical planning and osteotomy strategy aimed at restoring physiologic hindfoot biomechanics and Achilles tendon loading in patients with PCFD.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(5)
Izmir Institute of Technology (TR), Izmir University (TR), Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.