Isolation Game on Graphs

Abstract Given a graph G and a family of graphs $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> , an $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -isolating set, as introduced by Caro and Hansberg, is any set $$S\subset V(G)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mo>⊂</mml:mo> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> such that $$G - N[S]$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>[</mml:mo> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mo>]</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> contains no member of $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> as a subgraph. In this paper, we introduce a game in which two players with opposite goals are together building an $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -isolating set in G . Following the domination games, Dominator (Staller) wants that the resulting $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -isolating set obtained at the end of the game, is as small (as big) as possible, which leads to the graph invariant called the game $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -isolation number, denoted $$\iota _\textrm{g}(G,\mathcal F)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ι</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . We prove that the Continuation Principle holds in the $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -isolation game, and that the difference between the game $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -isolation numbers when either Dominator or Staller starts the game is at most 1. Considering two arbitrary families of graphs $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> and $$\mathcal F'$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mo>′</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:math> , we find relations between them that ensure $$\iota _\textrm{g}(G,{\mathcal {F}}') \le \iota _\textrm{g}(G,{\mathcal {F}})$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ι</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>′</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ι</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for any graph G . A special focus is given on the isolation game, which takes place when $$\mathcal {F}=\{K_2\}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Graphs and Combinatorics
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-026-03030-y
Primary Topic
Advanced Graph Theory Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Isolation Game on Graphs

Doug F. Rall, Tanja Dravec, Kirsti Kuenzel, Daniel Johnston et al.
Graphs and Combinatorics
Advanced Graph Theory Research
article

Isolation Game on Graphs

Doug F. Rall, Tanja Dravec, Kirsti Kuenzel, Daniel Johnston, Boštjan Brešar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Given a graph G and a family of graphs $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> , an $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -isolating set, as introduced by Caro and Hansberg, is any set $$S\subset V(G)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mo>⊂</mml:mo> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> such that $$G - N[S]$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>[</mml:mo> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mo>]</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> contains no member of $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> as a subgraph. In this paper, we introduce a game in which two players with opposite goals are together building an $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -isolating set in G . Following the domination games, Dominator (Staller) wants that the resulting $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -isolating set obtained at the end of the game, is as small (as big) as possible, which leads to the graph invariant called the game $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -isolation number, denoted $$\iota _\textrm{g}(G,\mathcal F)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ι</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . We prove that the Continuation Principle holds in the $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -isolation game, and that the difference between the game $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> -isolation numbers when either Dominator or Staller starts the game is at most 1. Considering two arbitrary families of graphs $$\mathcal F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:math> and $$\mathcal F'$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mo>′</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:math> , we find relations between them that ensure $$\iota _\textrm{g}(G,{\mathcal {F}}') \le \iota _\textrm{g}(G,{\mathcal {F}})$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ι</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>′</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ι</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for any graph G . A special focus is given on the isolation game, which takes place when $$\mathcal {F}=\{K_2\}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http

Graphs and CombinatoricsVol. 42(2)
University of Maribor (SI), Institute of Mathematics, Physics, and Mechanics (SI), Hartford Financial Services (United States), Trinity College (US), Furman University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Advanced Graph Theory Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.