Do AI-Generated Biases Shape Human Cognition? Evidence from a Reaction-Time Experiment

Since recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), new questions have emerged regarding how these tools influence human behavior and cognition. In the case of Large Language Models (LLMs) —algorithms trained on vast corpora for language generation— their proximity to human linguistic abilities has been increasingly debated. As human communication is goal-oriented, a central concern is whether the information conveyed by AI exhibits bias and whether such bias affects users information processing positively or negatively. Evidence indicates that AI systems can reproduce biases embedded in their training data (Bender et al. 2021), raising the risk that certain statements —potentially non-objective or disrespectful— may become fossilized in human cognition. Our study collects statements about men and women from Google's autocomplete feature and presents them to participants while measuring reaction times to assess if and how AI-related biases influence cognitive processing. This approach examines whether exposure to such information modifies human opinions or behaviors from a gender-based perspective.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18842254
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do AI-Generated Biases Shape Human Cognition? Evidence from a Reaction-Time Experiment

Natalia Moskvina, Nikoleta Pantelidou, Paolo Morosi, Tamara Serrano Romero* et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Do AI-Generated Biases Shape Human Cognition? Evidence from a Reaction-Time Experiment

Natalia Moskvina, Nikoleta Pantelidou, Paolo Morosi, Tamara Serrano Romero*, Raquel Montero, Evelina Leivada
article en

Abstract

Since recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), new questions have emerged regarding how these tools influence human behavior and cognition. In the case of Large Language Models (LLMs) —algorithms trained on vast corpora for language generation— their proximity to human linguistic abilities has been increasingly debated. As human communication is goal-oriented, a central concern is whether the information conveyed by AI exhibits bias and whether such bias affects users information processing positively or negatively. Evidence indicates that AI systems can reproduce biases embedded in their training data (Bender et al. 2021), raising the risk that certain statements —potentially non-objective or disrespectful— may become fossilized in human cognition. Our study collects statements about men and women from Google's autocomplete feature and presents them to participants while measuring reaction times to assess if and how AI-related biases influence cognitive processing. This approach examines whether exposure to such information modifies human opinions or behaviors from a gender-based perspective.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.