Dynamic Optimisation of Façade-Integrated Solar Cooling Elements: Adsorption Cooling Versus Photovoltaic Scenarios

Façade-integrated solar cooling technologies enable the utilisation of façade surface potential and the provision of resilient cooling. This work compares three solar cooling scenarios, positioning a solar cooling element in the west and east façades. The 2ACE scenario is based on a compact adsorption cooling concept, while the 2PV scenario directly drives a compression chiller with photovoltaic elements, and 2PVB incorporates an additional battery. All Modelica system models are implemented in Modelon Impact and operated using dynamic optimisation for the hottest day of the year. Results indicate that the 2ACE scenario, utilising the adsorbent Silica Gel SG123, achieves near to double the self-sufficiency compared to Zeolite 13X. No clear optimal area balance between west and east elements is apparent. The 2PV scenario only surpasses the 2ACE scenario’s self-sufficiency with increased total element area, whereas 2PVB enables a drastic increase and complete self-sufficiency. This highlights the limitation of the adsorption cooling scenario due to its inability to compensate for ventilation’s electrical energy consumption. However, photovoltaic scenarios are heavily reliant on the assumed energy efficiency ratio. Additionally, slender buildings with a low AV ratio require less façade area to achieve the same self-sufficiency level as wider buildings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solar
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/solar6020014
Primary Topic
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Optimisation of Façade-Integrated Solar Cooling Elements: Adsorption Cooling Versus Photovoltaic Scenarios

Simon Oskar Weber, Philip Leistner
Solar
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
article

Dynamic Optimisation of Façade-Integrated Solar Cooling Elements: Adsorption Cooling Versus Photovoltaic Scenarios

Simon Oskar Weber, Philip Leistner
article en

Abstract

Façade-integrated solar cooling technologies enable the utilisation of façade surface potential and the provision of resilient cooling. This work compares three solar cooling scenarios, positioning a solar cooling element in the west and east façades. The 2ACE scenario is based on a compact adsorption cooling concept, while the 2PV scenario directly drives a compression chiller with photovoltaic elements, and 2PVB incorporates an additional battery. All Modelica system models are implemented in Modelon Impact and operated using dynamic optimisation for the hottest day of the year. Results indicate that the 2ACE scenario, utilising the adsorbent Silica Gel SG123, achieves near to double the self-sufficiency compared to Zeolite 13X. No clear optimal area balance between west and east elements is apparent. The 2PV scenario only surpasses the 2ACE scenario’s self-sufficiency with increased total element area, whereas 2PVB enables a drastic increase and complete self-sufficiency. This highlights the limitation of the adsorption cooling scenario due to its inability to compensate for ventilation’s electrical energy consumption. However, photovoltaic scenarios are heavily reliant on the assumed energy efficiency ratio. Additionally, slender buildings with a low AV ratio require less façade area to achieve the same self-sufficiency level as wider buildings.

SolarVol. 6(2)
University of Stuttgart (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.