Intercomparison of seven collocated ground-based infrared spectrometer radiance observations and retrieved thermodynamic profiles

Abstract. Thermodynamic profiles, especially in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), are essential for many research and operational applications. Ground-based infrared spectrometers (IRS) are commercially available, and thermodynamic profiles in the ABL can be retrieved from these observations at 5 min resolution or better. This study deployed seven IRS systems within 5 m of each other in Boulder, Colorado, USA, in September–October 2023, providing an opportunity to evaluate the relative accuracy of the measured radiances from these systems as well as the retrieved thermodynamic profiles. The analysis demonstrates that the observed radiances from the seven instruments agree within 1 % of the ambient radiance in both opaque and more transparent channels. The differences in the spectral calibration between the instruments were smaller than 0.11 cm−1, relative to the nominal effective wavenumber of the metrology laser of 15 799 cm−1 (i.e., better than 7.1 ppm). Further, the retrieved temperature and humidity profiles agree with each other well within the uncertainty of the retrieved profiles, and quantities derived from these thermodynamic profiles such as precipitable water vapor and height of the convective boundary layer also agree within their uncertainties. These results demonstrate a high degree of repeatability and precision, and that if these instruments were deployed as part of a network, any differences larger than the retrieval uncertainty would be associated with real environmental differences and not an artifact of the instrument calibration or retrieval.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1573-2026
Primary Topic
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intercomparison of seven collocated ground-based infrared spectrometer radiance observations and retrieved thermodynamic profiles

James M. Wilczak, Vincent Michaud-Belleau, Laura Bianco, Luc Rochette et al.
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
article

Intercomparison of seven collocated ground-based infrared spectrometer radiance observations and retrieved thermodynamic profiles

James M. Wilczak, Vincent Michaud-Belleau, Laura Bianco, Luc Rochette, David D. Turner, Bianca Adler
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Thermodynamic profiles, especially in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), are essential for many research and operational applications. Ground-based infrared spectrometers (IRS) are commercially available, and thermodynamic profiles in the ABL can be retrieved from these observations at 5 min resolution or better. This study deployed seven IRS systems within 5 m of each other in Boulder, Colorado, USA, in September–October 2023, providing an opportunity to evaluate the relative accuracy of the measured radiances from these systems as well as the retrieved thermodynamic profiles. The analysis demonstrates that the observed radiances from the seven instruments agree within 1 % of the ambient radiance in both opaque and more transparent channels. The differences in the spectral calibration between the instruments were smaller than 0.11 cm−1, relative to the nominal effective wavenumber of the metrology laser of 15 799 cm−1 (i.e., better than 7.1 ppm). Further, the retrieved temperature and humidity profiles agree with each other well within the uncertainty of the retrieved profiles, and quantities derived from these thermodynamic profiles such as precipitable water vapor and height of the convective boundary layer also agree within their uncertainties. These results demonstrate a high degree of repeatability and precision, and that if these instruments were deployed as part of a network, any differences larger than the retrieval uncertainty would be associated with real environmental differences and not an artifact of the instrument calibration or retrieval.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 19(4)
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Université TÉLUQ (CA), NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory (US), Active Ethernet Passive Optical Networks Over λ MultipleXing (Canada) (CA), NOAA Global Systems Laboratory, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.