Deep Learning–Based Choroidal Boundary Detection in Geographic Atrophy Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To evaluate the challenges and limitations of a deep learning model for automated choroidal boundary detection in eyes with geographic atrophy (GA) using spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT), and to assess the workflow efficiency of an AI-assisted manual verification approach. <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective study, total 5723 scans (Heidelberg Spectralis) with GA were analyzed. A previously validated tool (NMI ChoroidAI) was used to segment the choroidal inner (CIB) and outer (COB) boundaries. We compared the "AI-assisted" workflow (automated segmentation followed by manual verification) against "manual segmentation only" in terms of accuracy and time consumption. Slice-wise boundary errors were graded as 0 (accurate), 1 (≤33% deviation), 2 (33-66% deviation), or 3 (>66% deviation). Outcomes included error rates and weighted F<sub>1</sub> score (and precision where applicable). Total time for manual-only segmentation versus AI-assisted verification was recorded. -Interreader variability was assessed between the two readers using intraclass correlation coefficient. <b>Results</b>: For CIB, only 5.2% of B-scans showed any deviation (strictly accurate in 94.8%), with weighted F<sub>1</sub> score 0.97 and precision 1.00. COB was more error-prone: 19.0% of B-scans showed deviation; however, when minor deviations were considered acceptable, COB acceptability increased to 94.2% (i.e., 5.8% remained >33% deviated). Only 13.2% of B-scans required minor manual correction. For a 97-scan volume, processing time decreased from an average of 7 h (manual only) to 45 min (AI + human verification), an approximate 90% reduction in manual effort. Inter-reader agreement was high (ICC 0.923 for CIB and 0.938 for COB). <b>Conclusions</b>: Although the deep learning model exhibits limitations in COB detection due to artifacts, it serves as a valuable assistive tool. Our model substantially reduces human effort, but mandatory human verification is required to correct boundary errors caused by hyper-transmission before use in clinical trials.
Authors
- Elham Rahmanipour (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8454-458X)
- Adarsh Gadari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8238-1957)
- Sandeep Chandra Bollepalli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9971-9335)
- Soumya Sharma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6556-9808)
- C. de los Santos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6927-1559)
- Nasiq Hasan
- Elham Sadeghi
- James Whitley
- Mario J Savaria
- Shreyaa Lall
- Jay Chhablani
- Kiran Kumar Vupparaboina
Institutions
- Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- OSRAM (United States) (US)
- Fundación para la Investigación, Docencia y Prevención del Cáncer (AR)
- Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires (AR)
- Fundación Centro de Estudios Infectológicos (AR)
- University of Toledo (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Diagnostics
- Published
- 2026-03-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16050737
- Primary Topic
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00