Assessing Financial Considerations of Circular Economy Practices Across Life Cycle Stages in the Construction Industry

The construction industry generates substantial waste, yet circular economy (CE) adoption remains sporadic despite EU regulatory pressure. Financial uncertainty and fragmented guidance keep firms hesitant. This study examines how construction stakeholders perceive CE’s financial costs and benefits across the building lifecycle. In total, 125 construction professionals participated, including 87 respondents who evaluated lifecycle-based costs and benefits and 38 Norwegian respondents who provided qualitative accounts of CE implementation cases. The combined analysis reveals that sectoral resistance stems primarily from financial concerns, underscoring the need for clearer cost–benefit expectations and regulatory incentives that make circularity economically viable. Three enablers emerge as critical: enhanced digital tools, policy innovation, and multi-stakeholder collaboration. The study contributes by empirically demonstrating how regulatory frameworks shape CE adoption through the integration of quantitative perceptions and qualitative case evidence. The implication is that targeted interventions addressing practitioners’ financial realities can accelerate the circular transition, but policies must move beyond aspiration to provide the economic certainty required for widespread adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circular Economy and Sustainability
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-026-00727-3
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Financial Considerations of Circular Economy Practices Across Life Cycle Stages in the Construction Industry

Ferhat Karaca, Giancarlo Paganin, Ivana Kildsgaard, Aidana Tleuken et al.
Circular Economy and Sustainability
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Assessing Financial Considerations of Circular Economy Practices Across Life Cycle Stages in the Construction Industry

Ferhat Karaca, Giancarlo Paganin, Ivana Kildsgaard, Aidana Tleuken, Thomas Laudal, D Bajare, Ali Turkyilmaz
article en

Abstract

The construction industry generates substantial waste, yet circular economy (CE) adoption remains sporadic despite EU regulatory pressure. Financial uncertainty and fragmented guidance keep firms hesitant. This study examines how construction stakeholders perceive CE’s financial costs and benefits across the building lifecycle. In total, 125 construction professionals participated, including 87 respondents who evaluated lifecycle-based costs and benefits and 38 Norwegian respondents who provided qualitative accounts of CE implementation cases. The combined analysis reveals that sectoral resistance stems primarily from financial concerns, underscoring the need for clearer cost–benefit expectations and regulatory incentives that make circularity economically viable. Three enablers emerge as critical: enhanced digital tools, policy innovation, and multi-stakeholder collaboration. The study contributes by empirically demonstrating how regulatory frameworks shape CE adoption through the integration of quantitative perceptions and qualitative case evidence. The implication is that targeted interventions addressing practitioners’ financial realities can accelerate the circular transition, but policies must move beyond aspiration to provide the economic certainty required for widespread adoption.

Circular Economy and SustainabilityVol. 6(2)
Riga Technical University (LV), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Nazarbayev University (KZ), University of Stavanger (NO), Politecnico di Milano (IT), University of Twente (NL)
Nazarbayev University
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.