Effects of Contextual Factors, and Cognitive and Metacognitive Learning Strategies on Academic Engagement of Secondary School Students

The prime aim of this study was to examine the effects of contextual factors and cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies on secondary school students’ academic engagement by employing an ex-post facto prospective research design. The data were gathered through self-report questionnaires from a sample of 700 (348 females and 352 males) students selected via a multi-stage random sampling technique from nine secondary schools. To examine the direct and indirect effects of contextual factors and cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies on academic engagement, Structural Equation Modeling/SEM with Analysis of Moment Structures/AMOS test was used. The findings of Structural equation Modeling analysis revealed that contextual factors had a significant direct effect on academic engagement (β=.475, p=.000<.001), on cognitive strategies (β=.454, p=.000<.001), and on metacognitive strategies (β=.313, p=.000<.001). Moreover, it also revealed that metacognitive strategies had a significant effect on academic engagement (β= .889, p=.000<.001). However, the result reveals that cognitive strategies didn’t have a significant effect on academic engagement (β= .208, p=.213 >.001). Additionally, the results showed that contextual factors had a significant indirect effect on academic engagement through the mediation of metacognitive strategies (β = .356, p = .002). In contrast, the indirect effect of contextual factors on academic engagement through cognitive strategies was not statistically significant (β = .094, p = .505).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20372/mwu.jessd.2026.1590
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Contextual Factors, and Cognitive and Metacognitive Learning Strategies on Academic Engagement of Secondary School Students

Tesfaye Girma Weldetsadik
National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Effects of Contextual Factors, and Cognitive and Metacognitive Learning Strategies on Academic Engagement of Secondary School Students

Tesfaye Girma Weldetsadik
article en

Abstract

The prime aim of this study was to examine the effects of contextual factors and cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies on secondary school students’ academic engagement by employing an ex-post facto prospective research design. The data were gathered through self-report questionnaires from a sample of 700 (348 females and 352 males) students selected via a multi-stage random sampling technique from nine secondary schools. To examine the direct and indirect effects of contextual factors and cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies on academic engagement, Structural Equation Modeling/SEM with Analysis of Moment Structures/AMOS test was used. The findings of Structural equation Modeling analysis revealed that contextual factors had a significant direct effect on academic engagement (β=.475, p=.000<.001), on cognitive strategies (β=.454, p=.000<.001), and on metacognitive strategies (β=.313, p=.000<.001). Moreover, it also revealed that metacognitive strategies had a significant effect on academic engagement (β= .889, p=.000<.001). However, the result reveals that cognitive strategies didn’t have a significant effect on academic engagement (β= .208, p=.213 >.001). Additionally, the results showed that contextual factors had a significant indirect effect on academic engagement through the mediation of metacognitive strategies (β = .356, p = .002). In contrast, the indirect effect of contextual factors on academic engagement through cognitive strategies was not statistically significant (β = .094, p = .505).

National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia
Madda Walabu University (ET)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.