Auditing and Monitoring Artificial Intelligence Systems in Healthcare: A Multilayer Framework for Bias Detection, Explainability, and Regulatory Compliance

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in clinical decision-making, yet most oversight approaches remain limited to pre-deployment validation or isolated technical evaluation. This gap creates risks related to bias, safety, accountability, and regulatory compliance once systems operate in real clinical environments. This article presents a normative, lifecycle-oriented auditing and monitoring framework for healthcare AI derived from a structured synthesis of literature on trustworthy AI, clinical risk management, and governance practice. The framework integrates four operational layers: (1) bias detection and fairness assessment; (2) explainability and model transparency; (3) performance, safety, and drift monitoring; and (4) regulatory and ethical compliance. Unlike prior models that treat technical validation and governance oversight separately, the proposed approach links continuous monitoring outputs to institutional decision authorities through predefined escalation pathways and role-based responsibilities across developers, clinicians, and governance bodies. The framework is designed for practical use by healthcare institutions, regulators, and AI developers. It provides guidance on monitoring frequency, the prioritization of fairness metrics based on clinical risk, the evaluation of clinically meaningful explanations, and adaptation across regulatory environments. By operationalizing auditing as an ongoing governance process rather than a one-time certification activity, the model supports the accountable and trustworthy deployment of AI systems throughout their real-world lifecycle. This work offers a structured foundation for aligning technical monitoring with clinical governance and regulatory expectations in healthcare AI implementation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.104547
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auditing and Monitoring Artificial Intelligence Systems in Healthcare: A Multilayer Framework for Bias Detection, Explainability, and Regulatory Compliance

Oghenetega Ejuone, Abdulraheem Olaide Babarinde, Valentina Palama, Aanuoluwapo F Adekoya et al.
Cureus
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Auditing and Monitoring Artificial Intelligence Systems in Healthcare: A Multilayer Framework for Bias Detection, Explainability, and Regulatory Compliance

Oghenetega Ejuone, Abdulraheem Olaide Babarinde, Valentina Palama, Aanuoluwapo F Adekoya, Jolaade Nwanze, Caleb Kadiri
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in clinical decision-making, yet most oversight approaches remain limited to pre-deployment validation or isolated technical evaluation. This gap creates risks related to bias, safety, accountability, and regulatory compliance once systems operate in real clinical environments. This article presents a normative, lifecycle-oriented auditing and monitoring framework for healthcare AI derived from a structured synthesis of literature on trustworthy AI, clinical risk management, and governance practice. The framework integrates four operational layers: (1) bias detection and fairness assessment; (2) explainability and model transparency; (3) performance, safety, and drift monitoring; and (4) regulatory and ethical compliance. Unlike prior models that treat technical validation and governance oversight separately, the proposed approach links continuous monitoring outputs to institutional decision authorities through predefined escalation pathways and role-based responsibilities across developers, clinicians, and governance bodies. The framework is designed for practical use by healthcare institutions, regulators, and AI developers. It provides guidance on monitoring frequency, the prioritization of fairness metrics based on clinical risk, the evaluation of clinically meaningful explanations, and adaptation across regulatory environments. By operationalizing auditing as an ongoing governance process rather than a one-time certification activity, the model supports the accountable and trustworthy deployment of AI systems throughout their real-world lifecycle. This work offers a structured foundation for aligning technical monitoring with clinical governance and regulatory expectations in healthcare AI implementation.

Cureus
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.