Patient and family perspectives on cascade screening for thoracic aortic disease: a mixed-methods evaluation

Cascade screening enables effective secondary prevention and early treatment for Thoracic Aortic Disease (TAD) and increases survival. Despite guideline recommendations, the uptake of screening remains low. This study investigated individual and organisational barriers to screening participation. We performed clinician and public focus groups (n = 19 participants across 5 sessions), semi-structured interviews (4 clinicians) and a national patient/relative survey (n = 242 responses: 71 probands, 171 relatives). Behavioural theories guided data interpretation and thematic analysis. Data collection explored motivations, psychological and practical burdens, communication dynamics and attitudes towards screening and Decision Support Tools (DSTs). A national survey of TAD patients and their families provided quantitative context on demographics, genetic testing uptake and involvement in shared decision-making. Thematic analysis using the framework approach was applied to qualitative data. Qualitative analysis of focus groups, interviews and a national patient/relative survey (n = 242) identified significant barriers to TAD cascade screening, including fragmented services, inconsistent clinician knowledge and patient confusion regarding genetic testing pathways. Survey data showed low genetic testing uptake (47% survivors; 44% and 21% for first- and second-degree relatives). Conversely, key facilitators for a DST included user-friendliness, multi-modal accessibility, clear risk/benefit communication and the inherent value of reassurance with professional endorsement from healthcare providers. These would directly address observed psychological and practical burdens. Patient and family engagement in TAD cascade screening faces complex barriers, including psychological burdens and systemic issues, resulting in a substantial shared decision-making gap. User-centric, multi-modal Decision Support Tools, supported by enhanced clinician education and structured family communication, are vital for effective TAD prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02051-8
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient and family perspectives on cascade screening for thoracic aortic disease: a mixed-methods evaluation

Joanne Miksza, Lisa D. Skinner, Julian Barwell, John Maltby et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Patient and family perspectives on cascade screening for thoracic aortic disease: a mixed-methods evaluation

Joanne Miksza, Lisa D. Skinner, Julian Barwell, John Maltby, G.J. McManus, Haleema Saadia, M. D. Bown, R.D. Sayers, Gareth Owens, Paul Clift, Riccardo Proietti, Nora Shannon, Una Ahern, Laerke Ghosh, Aung Oo, Kathryn Hewytt, Duke Cameron, John Elefteriades, Anne Cotton, George Krasopoulos, Gavin James Murphy, Riccardo Giuseppe Abbasciano, Hardeep Aujla, Nadeem Qureshi, Mark Lewis, Sue Page, Ramanjit Kaur
article en

Abstract

Cascade screening enables effective secondary prevention and early treatment for Thoracic Aortic Disease (TAD) and increases survival. Despite guideline recommendations, the uptake of screening remains low. This study investigated individual and organisational barriers to screening participation. We performed clinician and public focus groups (n = 19 participants across 5 sessions), semi-structured interviews (4 clinicians) and a national patient/relative survey (n = 242 responses: 71 probands, 171 relatives). Behavioural theories guided data interpretation and thematic analysis. Data collection explored motivations, psychological and practical burdens, communication dynamics and attitudes towards screening and Decision Support Tools (DSTs). A national survey of TAD patients and their families provided quantitative context on demographics, genetic testing uptake and involvement in shared decision-making. Thematic analysis using the framework approach was applied to qualitative data. Qualitative analysis of focus groups, interviews and a national patient/relative survey (n = 242) identified significant barriers to TAD cascade screening, including fragmented services, inconsistent clinician knowledge and patient confusion regarding genetic testing pathways. Survey data showed low genetic testing uptake (47% survivors; 44% and 21% for first- and second-degree relatives). Conversely, key facilitators for a DST included user-friendliness, multi-modal accessibility, clear risk/benefit communication and the inherent value of reassurance with professional endorsement from healthcare providers. These would directly address observed psychological and practical burdens. Patient and family engagement in TAD cascade screening faces complex barriers, including psychological burdens and systemic issues, resulting in a substantial shared decision-making gap. User-centric, multi-modal Decision Support Tools, supported by enhanced clinician education and structured family communication, are vital for effective TAD prevention.

European Journal of Human Genetics
St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), University of Leicester (GB), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB), John Radcliffe Hospital (GB), Yale University (US), Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital (GB), Health Awareness (United States) (US), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, British Heart Foundation, Department of Health and Social Care
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.