Co-Firing Characteristics of Biomass with Pulverized Coal in a Drop Tube Furnace: Effects of Co-Firing Ratios and Feeding Methods

Direct cofiring of biomass in coal-fired power plants is a cost-effective strategy for decarbonization. This study systematically investigates the effects of biomass cofiring ratios (0–30%) and feeding methods (cofeeding vs separate feeding) in a 100 kW drop tube furnace, focusing on combustion, emissions, and ash behavior. Increasing the biomass ratio enhanced fuel burnout to a maximum of 98.5% and advanced ignition, but elongated the flame by shifting the flame center downward. A critical trade-off in pollutant control was identified: separate feeding created a pronounced air-staging effect, reducing NOx emissions by an average of approximately 25% compared to cofeeding. Conversely, cofeeding promoted in situ SO2 capture by facilitating alkali-sulfur reactions; at a 30% ratio, cofeeding achieved a sulfur retention rate of 8.49%, which is nearly double that of separate feeding (4.63%), thereby verifying the dominant role of alkali-induced sulfur sequestration. While NOx emissions peaked at a 10% cofiring ratio before declining, biomass addition severely increased slagging risks, evidenced by a decrease in the ash softening temperature (ST) by over 150 °C (from 1494 to 1329 °C). This was attributed to the reaction of alkali metals (K, Na) with aluminosilicates to form low-melting-point minerals like K/Na-feldspar, leading to ash agglomeration. These findings provide crucial guidance for optimizing cofiring operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c06575
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-Firing Characteristics of Biomass with Pulverized Coal in a Drop Tube Furnace: Effects of Co-Firing Ratios and Feeding Methods

Jiaxing Song, Jiarui Yuan, C. Xu, Zhijiang Han et al.
Energy & Fuels
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Co-Firing Characteristics of Biomass with Pulverized Coal in a Drop Tube Furnace: Effects of Co-Firing Ratios and Feeding Methods

Jiaxing Song, Jiarui Yuan, C. Xu, Zhijiang Han, Shiyan Liu, Siyu Liu, Yuehua Li, Wubin Weng, Zhihua Wang, Yong He
article en

Abstract

Direct cofiring of biomass in coal-fired power plants is a cost-effective strategy for decarbonization. This study systematically investigates the effects of biomass cofiring ratios (0–30%) and feeding methods (cofeeding vs separate feeding) in a 100 kW drop tube furnace, focusing on combustion, emissions, and ash behavior. Increasing the biomass ratio enhanced fuel burnout to a maximum of 98.5% and advanced ignition, but elongated the flame by shifting the flame center downward. A critical trade-off in pollutant control was identified: separate feeding created a pronounced air-staging effect, reducing NOx emissions by an average of approximately 25% compared to cofeeding. Conversely, cofeeding promoted in situ SO2 capture by facilitating alkali-sulfur reactions; at a 30% ratio, cofeeding achieved a sulfur retention rate of 8.49%, which is nearly double that of separate feeding (4.63%), thereby verifying the dominant role of alkali-induced sulfur sequestration. While NOx emissions peaked at a 10% cofiring ratio before declining, biomass addition severely increased slagging risks, evidenced by a decrease in the ash softening temperature (ST) by over 150 °C (from 1494 to 1329 °C). This was attributed to the reaction of alkali metals (K, Na) with aluminosilicates to form low-melting-point minerals like K/Na-feldspar, leading to ash agglomeration. These findings provide crucial guidance for optimizing cofiring operations.

Energy & FuelsVol. 40(10)
Shanghai Industrial Boiler Research Institute (China) (CN), Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute (CN), Qinghai New Energy (China) (CN), State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.