Toxicities associated with CAR-T therapy compared with standard treatments in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) treatment has revolutionized the therapeutic approach for relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. But its unique toxicity profile, particularly immune-mediated adverse events, is a significant question in comparison with other high-intensity therapy strategies. Systematic, comparative, specific assessment of CAR-T–associated toxicities are essential to guide clinical practice and institutional preparedness. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the incidence and management of significant toxicities associated with CAR‐T therapy versus standard treatment approaches, including conventional chemotherapy‐based regimens, intensive monoclonal antibody–based therapies, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT). The primary outcomes looked for were cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), prolonged cytopenias, serious infections, and treatment-related mortality (TRM). Random-effects analysis was performed using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were planned according to comparator type, sensitivity analyses excluding CRS and ICANS, temporal toxicity analyses, and clinical heterogeneity assessments. CAR-T therapy was associated with significantly elevated risks of severe CRS and ICANS (relative risks [RRs] > 8) in relation to conventional chemotherapy, and that they might be mechanistically at baseline, suggesting fundamental differences in the underlying mechanism. These risks were reduced, though they stayed significant, when compared with the intensive monoclonal antibody–based therapies and allo-HSCT. In stark contrast, differences in prolonged cytopenia and serious infections were more modest and comparator dependent. In sensitivity analyses limited to hematologic and infectious toxicities, CAR-T therapy remained associated with increased risk of prolonged cytopenias (RR 3.10; 95% CI, 2.43–3.95) and serious infections (RR 2.00; 95% CI, 1.53–2.62), reinforcing the robustness of the findings beyond immune-mediated events. TRM was not significantly different from most comparisons. Temporal analyses showed a biphasic relationship of toxicity with early immune-mediated and intermediate/late hematologic and infectious events. The observed heterogeneity was attributed to the CAR-T construct, disease burden, prior treatment exposure, and institutional management practices. CAR-T therapy results in a unique, temporally concentrated toxicity phenotype as opposed to a uniformly higher toxicity burden than alternative high-intensity therapies. Although immune-mediated toxicities differentiate CAR-T therapy, hematologic and infectious risks overlap significantly with those of other advanced modalities, particularly allo-HSCT. The study emphasizes the imperative need for CAR-T therapy delivered in high-therapeutic-demand settings and in well-equipped centers with standardized toxicity management strategies, consistent with balanced, individualized treatment selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-15780-2
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toxicities associated with CAR-T therapy compared with standard treatments in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liliana Encinales, Jason M. Cuéllar, Óscar Madiedo, J A Mendez et al.
BMC Cancer
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Toxicities associated with CAR-T therapy compared with standard treatments in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liliana Encinales, Jason M. Cuéllar, Óscar Madiedo, J A Mendez, Alexandra Marin Morales, alexandra porras ramirez, Alejandra Hernández Osorio, Zuly Moreno Perilla, Juan Pablo Duque Bolívar, Marianna Carrillo Encinales, Alejandro Rico Mendoza
article en

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) treatment has revolutionized the therapeutic approach for relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. But its unique toxicity profile, particularly immune-mediated adverse events, is a significant question in comparison with other high-intensity therapy strategies. Systematic, comparative, specific assessment of CAR-T–associated toxicities are essential to guide clinical practice and institutional preparedness. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the incidence and management of significant toxicities associated with CAR‐T therapy versus standard treatment approaches, including conventional chemotherapy‐based regimens, intensive monoclonal antibody–based therapies, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT). The primary outcomes looked for were cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), prolonged cytopenias, serious infections, and treatment-related mortality (TRM). Random-effects analysis was performed using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were planned according to comparator type, sensitivity analyses excluding CRS and ICANS, temporal toxicity analyses, and clinical heterogeneity assessments. CAR-T therapy was associated with significantly elevated risks of severe CRS and ICANS (relative risks [RRs] > 8) in relation to conventional chemotherapy, and that they might be mechanistically at baseline, suggesting fundamental differences in the underlying mechanism. These risks were reduced, though they stayed significant, when compared with the intensive monoclonal antibody–based therapies and allo-HSCT. In stark contrast, differences in prolonged cytopenia and serious infections were more modest and comparator dependent. In sensitivity analyses limited to hematologic and infectious toxicities, CAR-T therapy remained associated with increased risk of prolonged cytopenias (RR 3.10; 95% CI, 2.43–3.95) and serious infections (RR 2.00; 95% CI, 1.53–2.62), reinforcing the robustness of the findings beyond immune-mediated events. TRM was not significantly different from most comparisons. Temporal analyses showed a biphasic relationship of toxicity with early immune-mediated and intermediate/late hematologic and infectious events. The observed heterogeneity was attributed to the CAR-T construct, disease burden, prior treatment exposure, and institutional management practices. CAR-T therapy results in a unique, temporally concentrated toxicity phenotype as opposed to a uniformly higher toxicity burden than alternative high-intensity therapies. Although immune-mediated toxicities differentiate CAR-T therapy, hematologic and infectious risks overlap significantly with those of other advanced modalities, particularly allo-HSCT. The study emphasizes the imperative need for CAR-T therapy delivered in high-therapeutic-demand settings and in well-equipped centers with standardized toxicity management strategies, consistent with balanced, individualized treatment selection.

BMC Cancer
Universidad El Bosque (CO), Universidad Metropolitana (CO), Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (CO), Universidad Autónoma de Occidente (CO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.