Could statistical potential models achieve comparable or better performance than deep learning models?
Accurately predicting protein-ligand interactions is vital for structure-based drug discovery. Although deep learning (DL) models have shown strong performance, the potential of traditional statistical potentials under data-limited conditions remains underexplored. Here, we systematically assess several statistical potential models in docking and virtual screening. We find that docking benefits from distance-dependent pairwise atom-atom potentials with clear physical meanings, while screening relies more on orientation-dependent atom-residue potentials that capture local chemical environments. Based on these findings, we propose HybridSP, a hybrid potential combining distance-dependent atom-atom, atom-residue, and orientation-dependent atom-residue terms. An affinity-weighted scheme is applied to correct biases in statistical distributions. On the CASF-2016 benchmark, HybridSP achieves a 91.6% docking success rate and an enrichment factor of 29.35 at the top 1%, rivaling and even surpassing state-of-the-art DL models. Its strong screening ability is further validated on directory of useful decoys-enhanced and directory of useful decoys-adjusted. These results demonstrate that well-designed statistical potentials can achieve high performance and interpretability without complex DL architectures, offering an efficient alternative for scoring function design. The models are available at: https://github.com/zelixirSH/HybridSP.git.
Authors
- Jianxi Luo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-8432)
- Jingjing Guo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9645-2246)
- Yuguang Mu
- Zhihao Wang
- Sheng Wang
Institutions
- Shandong University (CN)
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Viva Biotech (China) (CN)
- Macao Polytechnic University (MO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2026-02-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbag088
- Primary Topic
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00