Construction Accident Prediction via Generative AI and AutoML Approaches

The construction industry remains one of the most hazardous sectors, with a high incidence of injuries and fatalities, making accurate accident prediction essential for improving safety performance. Although machine learning and deep learning approaches have been widely applied to construction accident prediction, most prior studies have primarily focused on optimizing predictive accuracy within structured modeling pipelines under internal validation settings. In contrast, the application of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) for accident prediction remains relatively underexplored, and systematic comparisons between Generative AI and Automated Machine Learning (AutoML), particularly under standardized and external validation conditions, are limited. To address this research gap, this study provides a structured comparative evaluation of AutoML and a fine-tuned Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) model in terms of predictive performance, training efficiency, robustness under external validation, and operational usability. A dataset comprising construction accident cases obtained from Korea’s Construction Safety Management Integrated Information (CSI) was used. AutoML was employed to evaluate multiple machine learning classifiers, while a GPT-based model was fine-tuned to classify accident severity. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. The results indicate that AutoML achieved higher predictive accuracy (97.48%) under controlled training conditions, whereas the Generative AI model achieved 75.6%. However, AutoML required substantial preprocessing and optimization efforts. In contrast, the GPT-based model demonstrated greater deployment flexibility with minimal data preparation. External validation using newly observed imbalanced data revealed that AutoML experienced performance degradation, whereas the Generative AI model maintained relatively stable performance. These findings suggest that Generative AI may serve as a complementary and deployment-friendly alternative in construction accident prediction contexts where adaptability, external validation robustness, and usability are prioritized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052412
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction Accident Prediction via Generative AI and AutoML Approaches

Dahyun Oh, Kyubyung Kang, Jungho Jeon, HyunJung Park et al.
Applied Sciences
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Construction Accident Prediction via Generative AI and AutoML Approaches

Dahyun Oh, Kyubyung Kang, Jungho Jeon, HyunJung Park, Sungchul Seo
article en

Abstract

The construction industry remains one of the most hazardous sectors, with a high incidence of injuries and fatalities, making accurate accident prediction essential for improving safety performance. Although machine learning and deep learning approaches have been widely applied to construction accident prediction, most prior studies have primarily focused on optimizing predictive accuracy within structured modeling pipelines under internal validation settings. In contrast, the application of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) for accident prediction remains relatively underexplored, and systematic comparisons between Generative AI and Automated Machine Learning (AutoML), particularly under standardized and external validation conditions, are limited. To address this research gap, this study provides a structured comparative evaluation of AutoML and a fine-tuned Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) model in terms of predictive performance, training efficiency, robustness under external validation, and operational usability. A dataset comprising construction accident cases obtained from Korea’s Construction Safety Management Integrated Information (CSI) was used. AutoML was employed to evaluate multiple machine learning classifiers, while a GPT-based model was fine-tuned to classify accident severity. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. The results indicate that AutoML achieved higher predictive accuracy (97.48%) under controlled training conditions, whereas the Generative AI model achieved 75.6%. However, AutoML required substantial preprocessing and optimization efforts. In contrast, the GPT-based model demonstrated greater deployment flexibility with minimal data preparation. External validation using newly observed imbalanced data revealed that AutoML experienced performance degradation, whereas the Generative AI model maintained relatively stable performance. These findings suggest that Generative AI may serve as a complementary and deployment-friendly alternative in construction accident prediction contexts where adaptability, external validation robustness, and usability are prioritized.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(5)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Silla University (KR), Pusan National University (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.